Institute for Policy Studies  –  www.ips-dc.orgPolitical Research Associates

Right Web

Tracking militarists’ efforts to influence U.S. foreign policy

American Committee for Peace in Chechnya


Please note: IPS Right Web neither represents nor endorses any of the individuals or groups profiled on this site.

Formerly called the American Committee for Peace in Chechnya, the American Committee for Peace in the Caucasus (ACPC) is a project of Freedom House that claims to be "dedicated to monitoring developments in the region and providing expert analysis of their implications for security, stability and the human rights situation."[1]

ACPC was founded in 1999 by Freedom House, a neoconservative organization that has worked closely with the U.S. government, receiving funds from the National Endowment for Democracy and other U.S. democratization initiatives. ACPC updated its name to include the broader region after conflicts erupted between Russia and other Caucasus enclaves such as Ingushetia, Dagestan, Kabardino-Balkaria, Karachay-Cherkessia and North Ossetia.[2]

ACPC's activities include organizing public education programs, developing policy recommendations for lawmakers, and collaborating with activists, journalists, and scholars. It also works closely with a range of nongovernmental policy groups and think tanks, including the neoconservative policy outfit the American Enterprise Institute and the right-wing Jamestown Foundation. The committee distributes a weekly email news service and newsletter entitled News of the Week. ACPC's web site contains a news archive, policy papers relating to the U.S. role in the Caucasus, and academic papers, maps, and photos of the conflict.

Glen Howard, the president of the Jamestown Foundation, also serves as ACPC's executive director.[3] Howard previously worked as a military analyst for Science Applications International Corporation (SAIC), a high-tech defense contractor, and has served as a consultant for the Department of Defense, National Intelligence Council, and "major oil companies operating in Central Asia and the Middle East."[4]

The publications of Howard’s two organizations often overlap. For example, the Jamestown Foundation produces North Caucasus Weekly, an ezine that features contributions by ACPC board members.[5] ACPC’s website is typically dominated by reposts from Jamestown. Both groups also work extensively with Soviet defectors and Chechen dissidents.

ACPC's board of directors has included both Democratic and Republican elites, including Zbigniew Brzezinski, Alexander M. Haig, Jr., Steven J. Solarz, and Max Kampelman. The committee's more than one hundred members has also reflected a wide political spectrum, including such figures as Richard Gere, Morton Abramowitz, and the late Geraldine Ferraro. However, membership is overwhelmingly hawkish, and many high-profile neoconservatives, some associated with the Project for the New American Century, have featured on its membership rolls, including Richard Perle, Frank Gaffney, Elliott Abrams, Midge Decter, William Kristol, Michael Ledeen, and James Woolsey.[6]

ACPC supports the Chechen rebel movement, apparently as a strategy to weaken Russia and establish better U.S. ties in a region of increasing geopolitical value, which has vast, unexploited natural resource reserves including rich oil, gas, and hard mineral deposits.[7]

ACPC is perhaps the only U.S.-based organization in which national security militarists and neoconservatives openly support an insurgent movement that is not only nationalist but also largely Islamist.[8] Although ACPC notes its concern about human rights violations and issues of self-determination, far more attention appears to be given to simply advancing U.S. geopolitics by weakening Russia and China.[9]

The Smith Richardson Foundation has been the largest donor to the ACPC, giving sums totaling almost $420,000 to Freedom House from 2002-2004.[10]

Please note: IPS Right Web neither represents nor endorses any of the individuals or groups profiled on this site.

Please click the following link to bookmark this page:


If the link doesn't appear don't worry, your browser doesn't support this function.

Try pressing 'ctrl + d' on a PC or 'cmd + d' if your using a Mac.

Close

    Contact Information

    The American Committee for Peace in the Caucasus
    Freedom House
    1301 Connecticut Ave., NW, Floor 6
    Washington, DC 20036
    Phone: (202) 296-5101
    Email: acpc@peaceinthecaucasus.org

    Founded

    1999

    About (as of 2010)

    The American Committee for Peace in the Caucasus (ACPC), a project of Freedom House, coordinates with an international network of human rights and democracy advocates, journalists, scholars and nongovernmental organizations to advocate for and support human rights in the North Caucasus. ACPC is dedicated to monitoring developments in the region and providing expert analysis of their implications for security, stability and the human rights situation. In the aftermath of the two Chechen Wars and in the face of the ongoing violence across the region, ACPC strives to ensure access to information from the North Caucasus for the international policymaking and NGO community.

    Selected Principals (as of 2010)

    • Glen Howard: President
    • Max Kampelman: Co-Chair – Board of Directors
    • Richard Perle: Member
    • Frank Gaffney: Member
    • Elliott Abrams: Member
    • Midge Decter: Member
    • William Kristol: Member
    • Michael Ledeen: Member
    • James Woolsey: Member
American Committee for Peace in Chechnya News Feed

Right Web is not responsible for the content of external internet sites.

The Right Web Mission

Right Web tracks militarists’ efforts to influence U.S. foreign policy.

Sources

[1]American Committee for Peace in the Caucasus, “About ACPC,” http://www.peaceinthecaucasus.org/about.

[2]American Committee for Peace in the Caucasus, “About ACPC,” http://www.peaceinthecaucasus.org/about.

[3]The Jamestown Foundation, “Staff: Glen Howard” http://www.jamestown.org/aboutus/staff/.

[4]The Jamestown Foundation, “Staff: Glen Howard” http://www.jamestown.org/aboutus/staff/.

[5]The Jamestown Foundation, “North Caucasus Analysis”, http://www.jamestown.org/programs/nca/.

[6]American Committee for Peace in Chechnya, “Members,” http://web.archive.org/web/20051220135920/http://www.peaceinchechnya.org/about_members.htm.

[7]The Jamestown Foundation, Chechnya Weekly for March 9, 16, and 23, 2005, http://web.archive.org/web/20070930182502/http://www.jamestown.org/publications_archives.php?publication_id=1.

[8]John Laughland, “The Chechens’ American Friends,” The Guardian, September 8, 2004, http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2004/sep/08/usa.russia.

[9]Global Issues, Crisis in Chechnya, http://www.globalissues.org/article/100/crisis-in-chechnya.

[10]Conservative Transparency,“Smith Richardson Foundation,” http://mediamattersaction.org/transparency/organization/Smith_Richardson_Foundation/grants.

Latest Feature Articles
Whither the Liberal Hawks?

Jim Lobe | January 31, 2012

Tehran's threat to close the Strait of Hormuz, coupled with mounting threats from hawks in Israel and the United States, has brought the possibility of war sharply into view. But a number of influential members of the U.S. foreign policy establishment—including several prominent liberal interventionists who supported the invasion of Iraq—are warning against further escalation.

Rise of the Vulcans Redux

Peter Certo | December 19, 2011

The purported “end of the neocon consensus” has hardly meant an end to hawkishness in the GOP fold. With the Republican candidates virtually all gunning for Iran, backing right-wing Israeli policies toward the Palestinians, and stabling a passel of neoconservative advisers (Ron Paul excepted), voters have plenty of clues about what the foreign policy of a new GOP administration would look like. And while some of the candidates have expressed wariness with neoconservative notions of armed democracy promotion, all the signs indicate that if a Republican wins next year, we will likely be in for a bit if George W. redux.

Turning the Tide on the “Pro-Israel” Debate

Michael Flynn and Peter Certo | December 13, 2011

With key members of the "Israel Lobby" acknowledging the importance of providing a broader space to Israel’s critics, the indelibly beltway Politico recognizing the influence of such critics in a full-length feature, and core Democratic organizations showing an increasing sensitivity to inappropriate uses of the anti-Semite charge, is the United States finally willing to undertake a real debate on what are the best U.S. interests in the Middle East?

The China Divide and the Future of the GOP

Robert Farley | November 08, 2011

The issue of whither U.S. relations with China is an important test case for observing the divide between the free market and neoconservative wings of the Republican Party. Thus far, the GOP presidential candidates have largely failed to articulate a vision of China that comes anywhere close to reflecting the complexity of U.S.-Chinese relations. Among the leading candidates, Mitt Romney has arguably been the most aggressive in his discussion of China policy. Yet, his embrace of a hawkish line towards Beijing would appear to indicate that President Obama’s would-be challengers have not yet found an alternative vocabulary for talking and thinking about one of the critical foreign policy issues of the 2012 election. It seems clear that even though neoconservatives lack grassroots support, they offer what is effectively the only option for an “establishment” GOP candidate, a fact that could have lasting impact both on the viability of any Republican Party foreign policy platform as well as future U.S. decision-making vis-à-vis other hotspots like Iran, Israel, and North Korea.

Right Web | rightweb.irc-online.org


1112 16th St. NW, Suite 600,
Washington, DC 20036
USA
|
|
202-234-9382

Except where otherwise noted, content on this site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License

Right Web is a project of the Institute for Policy Studies; www.ips-dc.org