Institute for Policy Studies  –  www.ips-dc.orgPolitical Research Associates

Right Web

Tracking militarists’ efforts to influence U.S. foreign policy

Gordon England


    Deputy Secretary of Defense Designee
    Secretary of the Navy
    General Dynamics: Former executive vice president
    Jewish Institute for National Security Affairs: Recipient, 2001 Sen. Henry "Scoop" Jackson Award

Please note: IPS Right Web neither represents nor endorses any of the individuals or groups profiled on this site.

Highlights & Quotes Like other armed service secretaries originally appointed by George W. Bush—including James Roche and Thomas White—Gordon England arrived at the Pentagon fresh from duties as an executive of a major corporation, in this case the Pentagon contractor General Dynamics. Gordon, along with his boss Donald Rumsfeld, is a champion of military transformation. According to a Washington Times article about his appointment, one of Gordon’s chief aims as navy secretary is to develop “futuristic weapons to counter new types of threats emerging in the post-Soviet world.” General Dynamics specializes in the design of attack and ballistic missile submarines as well as tanks. (3) (5)

In late March 2005, George W. Bush nominated England as deputy secretary of defense to replace Paul Wolfowitz, who was tagged by the president to head the World Bank. England served as Navy secretary from 2001 to 2003, when he became acting deputy secretary for homeland defense. He returned to his original Navy post in late 2003, after his successor, Colin R. McMillan, committed suicide. (4) (9)

While at the Pentagon, one of England’s key tasks was to decide what to do with Guantanamo detainees who were being held as enemy combatants. At the end of this review process, 38 persons were released due to lack of evidence, what England called “thin files.” These released detainees comprised 7% of the population at the detention center, and join 214 others who have been released because of diplomatic pressure from other nations. The Pentagon began its review after a June 2004 Supreme Court ruling that granted Guantanamo prisoners the right to plead their cases in U.S. courts. (8)

England has an engineering background and has never served in the armed forces. Like many other foreign policy officials in the Bush administration, he has been criticized as a “chicken hawk.” (7) He is not a neoconservative but rather a creature of the military-industrial complex. In 2001 England received the Distinguished Service award from the Jewish Institute for National Security Affairs (JINSA), a policy institute closely associated with the Likud party and the Israeli military, as well as with the U.S. neoconservative camp and U.S. military contractors.

In his acceptance of the JINSA award, England said:

“To receive the Henry M. Jackson Distinguished Service Award has a very special meaning particularly if you’re Secretary of the Navy because he was such a strong proponent of national defense. I say that as Secretary of the Navy because the U.S. Navy has long recognized Senator Jackson’s service and patriotism by having a powerful, ballistic submarine proudly carry his name. The USS Henry M. Jackson is today on station serving our nation.

“I particularly want to thank JINSA for its long support on behalf of national defense since it was founded 25 years ago. The events of September 11th provide a useful perspective relative to this mission.

“Having achieved victory over the Axis power in WWII and following the fall of the Berlin Wall, most people in the United States and around the world concluded that having prevailed over the two evil empires of the 20th century, the world was on the verge of a long period of peace and prosperity.

“Some historians and writers likened the fall of the Berlin Fall (sic) to the beginning of Pax Romana, 200 years of world peace of the Roman Empire. After 40 plus years peace in Israel also looked promising.

“This world view is slightly clouded by Saddam Hussein and Desert Storm in the early 1990s. Once that conflict was over, the very quick and decisive allied victory was considered a validation of previous conclusions.” (2)

Please note: IPS Right Web neither represents nor endorses any of the individuals or groups profiled on this site.

Please click the following link to bookmark this page:


If the link doesn't appear don't worry, your browser doesn't support this function.

Try pressing 'ctrl + d' on a PC or 'cmd + d' if your using a Mac.

Close
    Institutional Affiliations

  • Jewish Institute for National Security Affairs: Award recipient (2)
  • Goodwill International: Vice Chair (1)
  • USO: Former member, Board of Governors (1)
  • Texas Christian University: Former member, Board of Visitors (1)


  • Government Service

  • Department of Defense: Secretary of the Navy (2001-2003, September 2003-2005) (1)(4)
  • Department of Homeland Security: Deputy Secretary (January 2003-September 2003) (1)
  • Defense Science Board: Former member (1)
  • Corporate Connections/Business Interests

  • General Dynamics: Executive vice president (1997-2001) (1)
  • Combat Systems Group: Former executive vice president (1)
  • General Dynamics Fort Worth Aircraft Company (later Lockheed): Former president (1)
  • General Dynamics Land Systems Company: Former president (1)
  • Honeywell: Engineer for the Gemini Space Program (7)
  • Litton Industries: Program Manager for the Navy's E-2C Hawkeye aircraft (7)
  • Education

  • University of Maryland: Bachelor's in electrical engineering (1961) (1)
  • Texas Christian University: MBA (1975) (1)


  • Right Web Connections

  • James Roche
  • Donald Rumsfeld
  • Thomas White
  • Paul Wolfowitz

  • Jewish Institute for National Security Affairs


Gordon England News Feed

Right Web is not responsible for the content of external internet sites.

The Right Web Mission

Right Web tracks militarists’ efforts to influence U.S. foreign policy.

Sources
(1) U.S. Navy: Bios: Gordon England
http://www.chinfo.navy.mil/navpalib/people/secnav/england-bio-73.html

(2) JINSA's 2001 Jackson Award Ceremony
http://www.jinsa.org/articles/articles.html/function/view/categoryid/1366/documentid/1385/history/3,2166,1366,1385

(3) "Axis of Influence: Appendix C: Who's Who in the Bush Administration
http://www.worldpolicy.org/projects/arms/reports/axisofinfluence.html#AppC

(4) Reuters, "Bush picks England as deputy defense secretary," March 31, 2005
http://www.reuters.com/newsArticle.jhtml?type=topNews&storyID=8055942

(5) Arms Trade Resource Center, "Current Updates," May 7, 2001
http://www.worldpolicy.org/projects/arms/updates/050701.htm

(6) Foreign Policy In Focus, "The Republican Rule: Other Officials' Profiles"
http://www.fpif.org/republicanrule/officials_body.html

(7) U.S. Committee for a Free Lebanon: Who's Who in the Bush Administration
http://www.freelebanon.org/articles/a308.htm

(8) Will Dunham, "U.S. to Release 38 Guantanamo Detainees," Reuters, March 29, 2005
http://www.reuters.com/newsArticle.jhtml?type=topNews&storyID=8029134

(9) Bradley Graham, "Wolfowitz Successor Picked: Navy Secretary Is Bush's Choice for No. 2 Defense Job," The Washington Post, April 1, 2005
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A16949-2005Mar31.html
Latest Feature Articles
Whither the Liberal Hawks?

Jim Lobe | January 31, 2012

Tehran's threat to close the Strait of Hormuz, coupled with mounting threats from hawks in Israel and the United States, has brought the possibility of war sharply into view. But a number of influential members of the U.S. foreign policy establishment—including several prominent liberal interventionists who supported the invasion of Iraq—are warning against further escalation.

Rise of the Vulcans Redux

Peter Certo | December 19, 2011

The purported “end of the neocon consensus” has hardly meant an end to hawkishness in the GOP fold. With the Republican candidates virtually all gunning for Iran, backing right-wing Israeli policies toward the Palestinians, and stabling a passel of neoconservative advisers (Ron Paul excepted), voters have plenty of clues about what the foreign policy of a new GOP administration would look like. And while some of the candidates have expressed wariness with neoconservative notions of armed democracy promotion, all the signs indicate that if a Republican wins next year, we will likely be in for a bit if George W. redux.

Turning the Tide on the “Pro-Israel” Debate

Michael Flynn and Peter Certo | December 13, 2011

With key members of the "Israel Lobby" acknowledging the importance of providing a broader space to Israel’s critics, the indelibly beltway Politico recognizing the influence of such critics in a full-length feature, and core Democratic organizations showing an increasing sensitivity to inappropriate uses of the anti-Semite charge, is the United States finally willing to undertake a real debate on what are the best U.S. interests in the Middle East?

The China Divide and the Future of the GOP

Robert Farley | November 08, 2011

The issue of whither U.S. relations with China is an important test case for observing the divide between the free market and neoconservative wings of the Republican Party. Thus far, the GOP presidential candidates have largely failed to articulate a vision of China that comes anywhere close to reflecting the complexity of U.S.-Chinese relations. Among the leading candidates, Mitt Romney has arguably been the most aggressive in his discussion of China policy. Yet, his embrace of a hawkish line towards Beijing would appear to indicate that President Obama’s would-be challengers have not yet found an alternative vocabulary for talking and thinking about one of the critical foreign policy issues of the 2012 election. It seems clear that even though neoconservatives lack grassroots support, they offer what is effectively the only option for an “establishment” GOP candidate, a fact that could have lasting impact both on the viability of any Republican Party foreign policy platform as well as future U.S. decision-making vis-à-vis other hotspots like Iran, Israel, and North Korea.

Right Web | rightweb.irc-online.org


1112 16th St. NW, Suite 600,
Washington, DC 20036
USA
|
|
202-234-9382

Except where otherwise noted, content on this site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License

Right Web is a project of the Institute for Policy Studies; www.ips-dc.org