Institute for Policy Studies  –  www.ips-dc.orgPolitical Research Associates

Right Web

Tracking militarists’ efforts to influence U.S. foreign policy

Noah Pollak


    • Emergency Committee for Israel: Director
    • Commentary: Contributor
    • Middle East Forum: Former editorial assistant

Please note: IPS Right Web neither represents nor endorses any of the individuals or groups profiled on this site.

An up-and-coming neoconservative writer and pundit, Noah Pollak has worked for an array of militarist “pro-Israel” organizations since the early 2000s, including as a contributing writer for Commentary magazine, the flagship neocon publication in the United States, and as an assistant editor of Middle East Quarterly, published by Daniel PipesMiddle East Forum.[1]

Pollak drew attention when he was identified with the launching of the Emergency Committee for Israel, a Washington-based pressure group established in mid-2010 that claims “to provide citizens with the facts they need to be sure that their public officials are supporting a strong US-Israel relationship.” ECI’s first act was to run a controversial attack ad in July 2010 targeting the track record of Senate candidate Rep. Joe Sestak (D-PA), which insinuated that he supported terrorists.[2]

ECI board members include William Kristol, editor and founder of the Weekly Standard and cofounder of the Foreign Policy Initiative; Rachel Abrams, wife of notorious Iran-Contra veteran Elliott Abrams; and Gary Bauer, a well-know Christian Zionist who leads the lobby groups American Values and Keep Israel Safe and serves on the executive board of John Hagee’s Christians United for Israel.

Although his role in the organization was not formally mentioned on ECI’s website as of mid-2010, Pollak was identified in a number of new reports as the group’s executive director.[3] In an interview with the right-wing Jerusalem Post, Pollak justified creation of the group, saying, “We will not rest until there is a pro-Israel group representing every pro-Israel person on earth.”[4]

Asked how ECI differed from other “pro-Israel” groups, Pollak said:

"Well, for starters, ECI is pro-Israel. Our purpose is to address three major threats to the U.S.-Israel alliance in the context of the American political debate: the Iranian nuclear program and Iran's sponsorship of terrorist groups; the campaign to delegitimize and isolate Israel; and the hostility of the Obama administration to the traditional closeness of the two nations. At bottom, we believe that the turn against Israel is a rejection of America's special role in the world as a defender of liberal democracies. We will do great damage to our own national soul if we allow ourselves to become cynical participants in the international lynching of the Jewish state."[5]

During a CNN interview with Campbell Brown (spouse of neocon figure Dan Senor of the Foreign Policy Initiative) in early July 2010, Pollak highlighted the Iranian threat. Asked whether Israel and the United States were on the “same page,” Pollak said he thought not, but that “there is a developing consensus that something needs to be done and that it would be very, very bad if the Iranians went nuclear.”[6]

Inter Press Service writer Eli Clifton discovered that ECI’s website domain was initially registered to a long-standing Republican Party figure, Margaret Hoover, who served under Karl Rove in the U.S. State Department during the George W. Bush presidency. Hoover, great granddaughter of Herbert Hoover, is a right-wing pundit and blogger who has appeared on Fox News and other media outlets.

Commenting on Pollak’s and Hoover’s work on ECI, Clifton wrote:

"It’s pretty clear that Pollak and Hoover, along with the people behind Keep Israel Safe and Stop Iran Now, are part of the extensive neoconservative echo chamber which seeks to create the appearance of a diverse coalition of grassroots groups calling on the US to prevent Iran from going nuclear by any means necessary. Things as simple as a looking at the registration on a domain name reveal that these groups are part of an intensely partisan (both Republican and Likudist) campaign to push the U.S. into a military conflict with Iran. And CNN, which just last week summarily fired a senior editor for a tweet praising the late Sayyed Mohammed Hussein Fadlallah, is amplifying their message."

Pollak got his start in neoconservative and Likud Party politics shortly after graduating from Vermont University in 2003.[7] After graduation he moved to Israel, where he worked as an assistant editor for Azure, a magazine published by the Shalem Center. The Jerusalem-based center is aligned with Israel's conservative Likud Party and claims to engage "in research, education, and publications in areas that include Jewish moral and political thought, Zionist history and ideas, Biblical archaeology, democratic theory and practice, strategic studies, and economic and social policy.” One of its projects is the Adelson Institute for Strategic Studies, which is funded by major Republican Party donor Sheldon Adelson.[8]

Pollak also seems to have served as an adviser to the Israeli Defense Forces. Announcing ECI’s launching, neoconservative blogger David Frum wrote:

"Probably much of the press attention will go to the group's directors, which include Bill Kristol. But the real news is the group's director: Noah Pollak, a friend of mine, and a brilliant advocate for rethinking Israel's self-defense in a new media era. As a blogger, he proposed that the Israeli Defense Forces [l]aunch their own YouTube channel, which did enormous service rebutting falsehoods during the Gaza campaign. It's long been a thesis of mine, to adapt Clausewitz, that modern warfare is PR by other means. Pollak understands this truth (wrote his Yale thesis on it)—and friends of Israel will be excited to watch his deployment of the truth in the critical days ahead."[9]

Please note: IPS Right Web neither represents nor endorses any of the individuals or groups profiled on this site.

Please click the following link to bookmark this page:


If the link doesn't appear don't worry, your browser doesn't support this function.

Try pressing 'ctrl + d' on a PC or 'cmd + d' if your using a Mac.

Close

    Affiliations

    • Emergency Committee for Israel: Executive director
    • Commentary: Contributor
    • Middle East Forum: Former assistant editor, Middle East Quarterly
    • Shalem Center: Former assistant editor, Azure magazine

    Education

    • Yale University: Graduate student (as of 2010)
    • Vermont University: BA (2003)
Noah Pollak News Feed
The Right Web Mission

Right Web tracks militarists’ efforts to influence U.S. foreign policy.

Sources

[1]
Yale MacMIllan Center, “Intenational Relations Students,” http://www.yale.edu/macmillan/iac/students.htm#pollak (accessed 18 July 2010).

[2] Eli Clifton, “Familiar Neocons And Christian Zionist Head Up New “Emergency Committee For Israel” Inter Press Service, Lobelog, July 13, 2010, http://www.lobelog.com/familiar-neocons-and-christian-zionist-head-up-new-emergency-committee-for-israel/.

[3] Eli Clifton, “Former Bush Administration Official Heads Up Latest Astroturf Group Pushing For Attack On Iran,” Inter Press Service, LobeLog.com, July 11, 2010,  http://www.lobelog.com/former-bush-administration-official-heads-up-latest-astroturf-group-pushing-for-attack-on-iran/.

[4] Shmuel Posner, “Noah Pollak on ‘cynical participants in the international lynching of the Jewish state,’” Jerusalem Post, Posner’s Domain, July 15, 2010, http://cgis.jpost.com/Blogs/rosner/entry/noah_pollak_on_cynical_participants

[5] Shmuel Posner, “Noah Pollak on ‘cynical participants in the international lynching of the Jewish state,’” Jerusalem Post, Posner’s Domain, July 15, 2010, http://cgis.jpost.com/Blogs/rosner/entry/noah_pollak_on_cynical_participants

[6] CNN Transcripts, “CAMPBELL BROWN: Immigration Showdown; President Obama Meets With Israeli Prime Minister,” CNN, July 6, 2010, http://www.cnnstudentnews.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/1007/06/ec.01.html.

[7] Yale MacMIllan Center, “Intenational Relations Students,” http://www.yale.edu/macmillan/iac/students.htm#pollak (accessed 18 July 2010).

[8] Israel News Agency, February 6, 2007; Philanthropy News Digest, May 3, 2007

[9] David Frum, “Emergency Committee for Israel,” The Atlantic, The Daily Dish, July 13, 2010, http://andrewsullivan.theatlantic.com/the_daily_dish/2010/07/emergency-committee-for-israel.html.

Latest Feature Articles
Whither the Liberal Hawks?

Jim Lobe | January 31, 2012

Tehran's threat to close the Strait of Hormuz, coupled with mounting threats from hawks in Israel and the United States, has brought the possibility of war sharply into view. But a number of influential members of the U.S. foreign policy establishment—including several prominent liberal interventionists who supported the invasion of Iraq—are warning against further escalation.

Rise of the Vulcans Redux

Peter Certo | December 19, 2011

The purported “end of the neocon consensus” has hardly meant an end to hawkishness in the GOP fold. With the Republican candidates virtually all gunning for Iran, backing right-wing Israeli policies toward the Palestinians, and stabling a passel of neoconservative advisers (Ron Paul excepted), voters have plenty of clues about what the foreign policy of a new GOP administration would look like. And while some of the candidates have expressed wariness with neoconservative notions of armed democracy promotion, all the signs indicate that if a Republican wins next year, we will likely be in for a bit if George W. redux.

Turning the Tide on the “Pro-Israel” Debate

Michael Flynn and Peter Certo | December 13, 2011

With key members of the "Israel Lobby" acknowledging the importance of providing a broader space to Israel’s critics, the indelibly beltway Politico recognizing the influence of such critics in a full-length feature, and core Democratic organizations showing an increasing sensitivity to inappropriate uses of the anti-Semite charge, is the United States finally willing to undertake a real debate on what are the best U.S. interests in the Middle East?

The China Divide and the Future of the GOP

Robert Farley | November 08, 2011

The issue of whither U.S. relations with China is an important test case for observing the divide between the free market and neoconservative wings of the Republican Party. Thus far, the GOP presidential candidates have largely failed to articulate a vision of China that comes anywhere close to reflecting the complexity of U.S.-Chinese relations. Among the leading candidates, Mitt Romney has arguably been the most aggressive in his discussion of China policy. Yet, his embrace of a hawkish line towards Beijing would appear to indicate that President Obama’s would-be challengers have not yet found an alternative vocabulary for talking and thinking about one of the critical foreign policy issues of the 2012 election. It seems clear that even though neoconservatives lack grassroots support, they offer what is effectively the only option for an “establishment” GOP candidate, a fact that could have lasting impact both on the viability of any Republican Party foreign policy platform as well as future U.S. decision-making vis-à-vis other hotspots like Iran, Israel, and North Korea.

Right Web | rightweb.irc-online.org


1112 16th St. NW, Suite 600,
Washington, DC 20036
USA
|
|
202-234-9382

Except where otherwise noted, content on this site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License

Right Web is a project of the Institute for Policy Studies; www.ips-dc.org