Institute for Policy Studies  –  www.ips-dc.orgPolitical Research Associates

Right Web

Tracking militarists’ efforts to influence U.S. foreign policy

United Against Nuclear Iran


Please note: IPS Right Web neither represents nor endorses any of the individuals or groups profiled on this site.

United against Nuclear Iran (UANI) claims to be "a non-partisan, broad-based coalition that is united in a commitment to prevent Iran from fulfilling its ambition to become a regional super-power possessing nuclear weapons." A program of the American Coalition Against Nuclear Iran, Inc., a 501(c)(3) organization, UANI's aims include informing "the public about the nature of the Iranian regime"; heightening "awareness nationally and internationally about the danger that a nuclear-armed Iran poses to the region and the world"; persuading "the regime in Tehran to desist from its quest for nuclear weapons, while striving not to punish the Iranian people"; and promoting "efforts that focus on vigorous national and international, social, economic, political, and diplomatic measures." [1]

In January 2010, UANI followed up on earlier initiatives aimed at pressuring companies to stop doing business in Iran by launching the "Iran Disclosure Project," described by UANI as "an initiative to identify publicly-traded companies that have business dealings in Iran and ensure that such companies adequately inform investors of the legal and financial peril associated with such dealings." [2]

The first target of the program was Royal Dutch Shell. UANI sent the company's CEO, Peter Voser, a letter in mid-December 2009 claiming Shell had revealed "only cursory disclosures regarding [its] dealings with Iran, disclosures that certainly provide less information to investors than is required by the U.S. securities laws." The letter warned, "In the event Royal Dutch Shell continues its business operations in Iran and fails to adequately disclose the risks of such business, UANI will pursue appropriate legal action against Royal Dutch Shell, will call on the New York Stock Exchange and the London Stock Exchange to delist Royal Dutch Shell and will assist the many Royal Dutch shareholders who oppose Royal Dutch Shell's activities in Iran." [3]

According to BusinessWeek, a Shell spokesman responded to queries about the UANI letter saying "if there's international agreement on new sanctions, the company will comply." [4]

Ideological Connections

Although UANI strives to communicate a politically centrist position, the group's advisory board, as of January 2010, featured a number of prominent neoconservatives and other hardline rightists, including Fouad Ajami, director of Middle East Studies at the Johns Hopkins University School for Advanced International Studies; Karen Hughes, a former adviser to President George W. Bush; James Woolsey, former CIA director and high-profile neoconservative activist; Henry Sokolski, a hawkish strategic weapons expert; and Mike Gerson, a former spokesperson for President Bush. [5]

UANI's president is Mark Wallace, a former U.S. diplomat at the United Nations, legal adviser to the Department of Homeland Security, and deputy campaign manager for the 2004 reelection campaign of President Bush and Vice President Dick Cheney. The group advertises two original cofounders, both of whom were given high profile posts in the administration of President Barack Obama: Richard Holbrooke and Dennis Ross. [6]

UANI claims to represent a coalition of like-minded advocacy organizations. Coalition members, according to its website, include the American Iranian Democracy Initiative, the Democratic Party of Iranian Kurdistan, the Iran Task Force, Iran Watch, the Free Muslims Coalition, the Progressive American-Iranian Committee, the Wisconsin Project on Nuclear Arms Control, the Arcadia Foundation, and the Nonproliferation Policy Education Center. [7]

Ad Campaign

UANI made headlines in mid-2009 when it began running an ad on cable news channels that pushed the Obama administration to take a tougher line on Iran. The narrator of the 30-second ad, titled "Unclenched Fist," says, "This is Iran. Young, vibrant-a people Americans have no quarrel with. Unfortunately, this is also Iran-radical rulers seeking nuclear weapons, threatening the world. Americans can do something about it. We can put economic pressure on the Iranian regime-pressure to keep them from building a nuclear arsenal. And that will ensure security-for all of us." [8]

The fact that the ad, which represented an implicit criticism of the Obama administration's policy of engagement with Iran, was run by a group that highlights the role of two Obama administration diplomats raised questions among some observers. Wrote Robet Silverstien of Tikun Olam, "I'm shocked that [Dennis] Ross wouldn't have completely dissociated himself from this group considering his government role, and the fact that UANI is advocating a position that not only is dangerous and contrary to current U.S. policy, but mirrors Israel's interests and the goals of its military and intelligence apparatus." [9]

Explaining the ad, UANI's Wallace told Politico, "[Obama] offered an unclenched fist. Now it is up to the Iranian people and regime to extend a reciprocal open hand." He added that the Iranian people should "put pressure on their leadership" in the then- upcoming elections. [10]

UANI's activities also include promoting the work of other organizations advocating a tough line on Iran, pressuring businesses not to work with the country by publishing an "Iran Business Directory" that lists companies doing business in Iran, circulating petitions, and publicizing human rights violations committed by the Iranian government. UANI also publishes a newsletter entitled Eyes on Iran, which provides summaries of news stories focusing on Iran.

Please note: IPS Right Web neither represents nor endorses any of the individuals or groups profiled on this site.

Please click the following link to bookmark this page:


If the link doesn't appear don't worry, your browser doesn't support this function.

Try pressing 'ctrl + d' on a PC or 'cmd + d' if your using a Mac.

Close

    Contact Information

    United Against Nuclear Iran
    212-554-3296 phone
    212-554-3299 fax
    info@unitedagainstnucleariran.com
    www.unitedagainstnucleariran.com

     

    Founded

    • 2008

     

    Leadership (2009)

    • Mike Wallace, President
    • Richard Holbrooke, Co-founder
    • Dennis Ross, Co-founder
    • Fouad Ajami, Advisory Board
    • Jack David, Advisory Board
    • Leslie Gelb, Advisory Board
    • Karen Hughes, Advisory Board
    • Walter Russell Mead, Advisory Board
    • R. James Woolsey, Advisory Board
    • Henry Sokolski, Advisory Board
    • Kristen Silverberg, Advisory Board
    • Irwin Cotler, Advisory Board
    • Jackie Wolcott, Advisory Board
    • Alan Solow, Advisory Board
    • Mike Gerson, Advisory Board

     

    About UANI (2009)

    “United Against Nuclear Iran (UANI) is a program of the American Coalition Against Nuclear Iran, Inc., a section 501(c)(3) organization. UANI is a non-partisan, broad-based coalition that is united in a commitment to prevent Iran from fulfilling its ambition to become a regional super-power possessing nuclear weapons. UANI is an issue-based coalition in which each coalition member will have its own interests as well as the collective goal of advancing an Iran free of nuclear weapons.”

     

    Contributions and Grants (2008) [11]

    • $1,707,150

     

    Total Assets (End of 2008) [12]

    • $266,720
The Right Web Mission

Right Web tracks militarists’ efforts to influence U.S. foreign policy.

Sources

1. UANI, “Our Mission,” http://www.unitedagainstnucleariran.com/about/mission (accessed October 1, 2009)
2. UANI, “UANI Launches Iran Disclosure Project and Calls On Royal Dutch Shell to Provide Full Disclosure of its Business Dealings in Iran and the Incumbent Risks to Investors Associated With Such Activities,” January 12, 2010, http://www.unitedagainstnucleariran.com/press-releases/uani-launches-iran-disclosure-project-and-calls-royal-dutch-shell-provide-full-disclo
3. UANI, Letter to Peter Voser, CEO of Royal Dutch Shell, December 17, 2009, http://www.unitedagainstnucleariran.com/sites/default/files/Letter_to_Royal_Dutch_Shell.PDF
4. Indira A.R. Lakshmanan, “Tough Sanctions May Not Persuade Iran to Quit Nuclear Program,” BusinessWeek, January 12, 2010.
5. UANI, “Leadership,” http://www.unitedagainstnucleariran.com/about/leadership (accessed October 1, 2009).
6. UANI, “Leadership,” http://www.unitedagainstnucleariran.com/about/leadership (accessed October 1, 2009).
7. UANI, “Coalition Information,” http://www.unitedagainstnucleariran.com/about/coalition (accessed October 6, 2009.
8. Mike Allen, “Anti-Iran nuke group launches TV ad,” Politico, July 8, 2009.
9. Richard Silverstein, “Iran’s Game of Chicken,” Tikun Olam, June 15, 2009. See also, Daniel Luban, “Neoconservative Resurgence in the Age of Obama,” Right Web, August 26, 2009, http://www.rightweb.irc-online.org/articles/display/neoconservative_resurgence_in_the_age_of_obama.
10. Mike Allen, “Anti-Iran nuke group launches TV ad,” Politico, July 8, 2009.
11. American Coalition against a Nuclear Iran, IRS Form 990, 2008, http://www.unitedagainstnucleariran.com/sites/default/files/ACANI_2008_IRS_990.pdf
12. American Coalition against a Nuclear Iran, IRS Form 990, 2008, http://www.unitedagainstnucleariran.com/sites/default/files/ACANI_2008_IRS_990.pdf

Latest Feature Articles
Whither the Liberal Hawks?

Jim Lobe | January 31, 2012

Tehran's threat to close the Strait of Hormuz, coupled with mounting threats from hawks in Israel and the United States, has brought the possibility of war sharply into view. But a number of influential members of the U.S. foreign policy establishment—including several prominent liberal interventionists who supported the invasion of Iraq—are warning against further escalation.

Rise of the Vulcans Redux

Peter Certo | December 19, 2011

The purported “end of the neocon consensus” has hardly meant an end to hawkishness in the GOP fold. With the Republican candidates virtually all gunning for Iran, backing right-wing Israeli policies toward the Palestinians, and stabling a passel of neoconservative advisers (Ron Paul excepted), voters have plenty of clues about what the foreign policy of a new GOP administration would look like. And while some of the candidates have expressed wariness with neoconservative notions of armed democracy promotion, all the signs indicate that if a Republican wins next year, we will likely be in for a bit if George W. redux.

Turning the Tide on the “Pro-Israel” Debate

Michael Flynn and Peter Certo | December 13, 2011

With key members of the "Israel Lobby" acknowledging the importance of providing a broader space to Israel’s critics, the indelibly beltway Politico recognizing the influence of such critics in a full-length feature, and core Democratic organizations showing an increasing sensitivity to inappropriate uses of the anti-Semite charge, is the United States finally willing to undertake a real debate on what are the best U.S. interests in the Middle East?

The China Divide and the Future of the GOP

Robert Farley | November 08, 2011

The issue of whither U.S. relations with China is an important test case for observing the divide between the free market and neoconservative wings of the Republican Party. Thus far, the GOP presidential candidates have largely failed to articulate a vision of China that comes anywhere close to reflecting the complexity of U.S.-Chinese relations. Among the leading candidates, Mitt Romney has arguably been the most aggressive in his discussion of China policy. Yet, his embrace of a hawkish line towards Beijing would appear to indicate that President Obama’s would-be challengers have not yet found an alternative vocabulary for talking and thinking about one of the critical foreign policy issues of the 2012 election. It seems clear that even though neoconservatives lack grassroots support, they offer what is effectively the only option for an “establishment” GOP candidate, a fact that could have lasting impact both on the viability of any Republican Party foreign policy platform as well as future U.S. decision-making vis-à-vis other hotspots like Iran, Israel, and North Korea.

Right Web | rightweb.irc-online.org


1112 16th St. NW, Suite 600,
Washington, DC 20036
USA
|
|
202-234-9382

Except where otherwise noted, content on this site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License

Right Web is a project of the Institute for Policy Studies; www.ips-dc.org