Institute for Policy Studies  –  www.ips-dc.orgPolitical Research Associates

Right Web

Tracking militarists’ efforts to influence U.S. foreign policy

Martin Anderson


    • Hoover Institution: Fellow
    • Committee on the Present Danger: Former Member

Please note: IPS Right Web neither represents nor endorses any of the individuals or groups profiled on this site.

Martin Anderson is a fellow at the Hoover Institution, a conservative think tank based at Stanford University.[1] An economist known for his espousal of the philosophy of conservative author Ayn Rand,[2] Anderson has also been a key foreign policy hawk, having served as a member of the Cold War-era version of the Committee on the Present Danger and influencing the development of the Star Wars missile defense system.

Although best known for his role as an advisor to President Ronald Reagan (and for his staunch advocacy of Reagan’s legacy), Anderson served several other Republican presidents, including Richard Nixon and George H.W. Bush. During the George W. Bush presidency, Anderson was tapped to serve on the controversial Defense Policy Board, which was briefly chaired by neoconservative heavy weight Richard Perle and staffed with a number of Anderson’s colleagues at the Hoover Institution.[3]

While working for then-presidential candidate Reagan in 1979, Anderson helped generate ideas for what would later be dubbed the Star Wars missile defense system. Writes one historian of the Reagan era:

"In the summer of 1979, . . . Reagan made a trip, with one of his top aides, Hoover Institution economist Martin Anderson, to the North American Air Defense Command (NORAD) post in Colorado, where he witnessed a special demonstration of this center's tracking and display capabilities. . On the plane ride back to California, Reagan and [Anderson] . talked about the apparent terrible vulnerability of the United States, against which we, seemingly, were helpless. Soon after returning to California, Anderson was instructed to prepare a set of papers which would establish Reagan's position on strategic defense for the upcoming 1980 campaign. One of these reports presented three major options — first, following Jimmy Carter's early policy of relying on good Soviet intentions ('dangerous folly' in Anderson's opinion); second, a massive American arms buildup (which Anderson felt was 'apt to frighten as many people as it consoles'); and third, to build a radically new, 'preventative' air intercept defense system, much like Star Wars as it later became known."[4]

Anderson is the author of several books, including Revolution (Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 1988); Impostors in the Temple (Simon & Schuster, 1992); coauthor of Reagan, In His Own Hand: The Writings of Ronald Reagan That Reveal His Revolutionary Vision for America (Free Press, 2001); coauthor of Reagan, In His Own Voice: Ronald Reagan's Radio Addresses (Simon & Schuster Audio, 2001); coauthor of Stories In His Own Hand: The Everyday Wisdom of Ronald Reagan (Free Press, 2001).

His most recent book, co-written with his wife Annelise Anderson, is Reagan’s Secret War: The Untold Story of His Fight to Save the World from Nuclear Disaster. Published in 2009 (Crown), Reagan’s Secret War highlights Reagan’s efforts to abolish all nuclear weapons, a fact that is often ignored by many pro-Reagan conservatives (see Robert Farley, “The Nuclear Posture Attack,” Right Web, June 2, 2010).

Please note: IPS Right Web neither represents nor endorses any of the individuals or groups profiled on this site.

Please click the following link to bookmark this page:


If the link doesn't appear don't worry, your browser doesn't support this function.

Try pressing 'ctrl + d' on a PC or 'cmd + d' if your using a Mac.

Close

    Affiliations

    • Hoover Institution: Senior fellow
    • Nightly Business Report: Former TV Commentator 
    • Ludwig von Mises Institute: Adjunct Scholar
    • Republican National Convention: Delegate, 1992, 1996, 2000 
    • George W. Bush Presidential Campaign: Policy Adviser, 2000
    • Bob Dole Presidential Campaign: Policy Adviser, 1996 
    • Pete Wilson Presidential Campaign: Policy Adviser, 1995
    • Ronald Reagan Presidential Foundation: Trustee, 1985-90 
    • Ronald Reagan Presidential Campaign: Senior Policy Advisor, 1976 and 1980 
    • Committee on the Present Danger: Member, 1977-91
    • Rockefeller's Commission on Critical Choices for Americans: Member, 1973-75
    • Richard Nixon Presidential Campaign: Director of Research, 1968 
    • Columbia University Graduate School of Business: Associate Professor of Finance, 1965-68; Assistant Professor of Finance, 1962-65 
    • Harvard University and MIT Joint Center for Urban Studies: Research Fellow, 1961-62 
    • Dartmouth College Thayer School of Engineering: Assistant to the Dean, 1959

     

    Government

    • Defense Policy Board: Former member
    • National Commission on the Cost of Higher Education: Member, 1997-98
    • California Governor's Council of Economic Advisers: 1993-98
    • President's General Advisory Committee on Arms Control: Member, 1987-93
    • President's Economic Policy Advisory Board: Member, 1982-1989
    • President's Foreign Intelligence Advisory Board: Member, 1982-1985
    • Reagan Administration: Assistant to the President of the United States for Policy Development, 1981-82
    • Nixon Administration: Special Consultant to the President of the United States for Systems Analysis, 1970-71; Special Assistant to the President of the United States, 1969-1970
    • Arms Security Agency: Second Lieutenant, 1958-59

     

    Business

    • Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco: Public Interest Director, 1972-79

     

    Education

    • Dartmouth College: B.A., summa cum laude, 1957; M.S. in Engineering and Business Administration, 1958
    • Massachusetts Institute of Technology: Ph.D.,  in Industrial Management, 1962
The Right Web Mission

Right Web tracks militarists’ efforts to influence U.S. foreign policy.

Sources

[1]  Hoover Institution, “Martin Anderson,” http://www.hoover.org/bios/anderson.html

[2]  Maureen Dowd, “Where Atlas Shrugged Is Still Read Forthrightly,” New York Times, September 13, 1987.

[3]  Andre Verloy and Daniel Pollti, “Advisors of Influence: Nine Members of the Defense Policy Board Have Ties to Defense Contractors,” Center for Public Integrity, March 28, 2003, http://www.publicintegrity.org/articles/entry/374/

[4]  Philip Burch, Reagan, Bush, and Right-Wing Politics: Elites, Think Tanks, Power, and Policy. The American Right Wing at Court and In Action: Supreme Court Nominations and Major Policymaking (Greenwich, CT: Jai Press, 1997), p.141.

Latest Feature Articles
Whither the Liberal Hawks?

Jim Lobe | January 31, 2012

Tehran's threat to close the Strait of Hormuz, coupled with mounting threats from hawks in Israel and the United States, has brought the possibility of war sharply into view. But a number of influential members of the U.S. foreign policy establishment—including several prominent liberal interventionists who supported the invasion of Iraq—are warning against further escalation.

Rise of the Vulcans Redux

Peter Certo | December 19, 2011

The purported “end of the neocon consensus” has hardly meant an end to hawkishness in the GOP fold. With the Republican candidates virtually all gunning for Iran, backing right-wing Israeli policies toward the Palestinians, and stabling a passel of neoconservative advisers (Ron Paul excepted), voters have plenty of clues about what the foreign policy of a new GOP administration would look like. And while some of the candidates have expressed wariness with neoconservative notions of armed democracy promotion, all the signs indicate that if a Republican wins next year, we will likely be in for a bit if George W. redux.

Turning the Tide on the “Pro-Israel” Debate

Michael Flynn and Peter Certo | December 13, 2011

With key members of the "Israel Lobby" acknowledging the importance of providing a broader space to Israel’s critics, the indelibly beltway Politico recognizing the influence of such critics in a full-length feature, and core Democratic organizations showing an increasing sensitivity to inappropriate uses of the anti-Semite charge, is the United States finally willing to undertake a real debate on what are the best U.S. interests in the Middle East?

The China Divide and the Future of the GOP

Robert Farley | November 08, 2011

The issue of whither U.S. relations with China is an important test case for observing the divide between the free market and neoconservative wings of the Republican Party. Thus far, the GOP presidential candidates have largely failed to articulate a vision of China that comes anywhere close to reflecting the complexity of U.S.-Chinese relations. Among the leading candidates, Mitt Romney has arguably been the most aggressive in his discussion of China policy. Yet, his embrace of a hawkish line towards Beijing would appear to indicate that President Obama’s would-be challengers have not yet found an alternative vocabulary for talking and thinking about one of the critical foreign policy issues of the 2012 election. It seems clear that even though neoconservatives lack grassroots support, they offer what is effectively the only option for an “establishment” GOP candidate, a fact that could have lasting impact both on the viability of any Republican Party foreign policy platform as well as future U.S. decision-making vis-à-vis other hotspots like Iran, Israel, and North Korea.

Right Web | rightweb.irc-online.org


1112 16th St. NW, Suite 600,
Washington, DC 20036
USA
|
|
202-234-9382

Except where otherwise noted, content on this site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License

Right Web is a project of the Institute for Policy Studies; www.ips-dc.org