Institute for Policy Studies  –  www.ips-dc.orgPolitical Research Associates

Right Web

Tracking militarists’ efforts to influence U.S. foreign policy

Castle Rock Foundation


Please note: IPS Right Web neither represents nor endorses any of the individuals or groups profiled on this site.

Castle Rock Foundation

The Castle Rock Foundation (CRF), a major supporter of the Heritage Foundation and other rightist institutions and causes, is an outgrowth of the Adolph Coors Foundation, the philanthropic organization of the Colorado beer magnate family. The Coors Foundation, which largely restricts its funding to Colorado, allocated $36.6 million to establish Castle Rock in 1993 with the goals of promoting free enterprise, limited government, and personal responsibility.1 It claims to "encourage personal responsibility and leadership, and uphold traditional American values."2

While the Adolph Coors Foundation funds mainstream and geographically targeted causes, Castle Rock’s charitable giving more closely reflects the conservative ideology of the Coors family, which has been a key funder of the American Right since the early 1970s. Both foundations, however, are strongly under the control of the Coors family, according to the National Committee for Responsive Philanthropy, which reports that the “two foundations have the same executive director and board of trustees."3 Castle Rock’s politically driven agenda is evident from its charitable giving record. Major grantees have included Heritage and the Free Congress Foundation, both founded by New Right trail blazer Paul Weyrich.4

Adolph Coors Sr. founded the Coors brewing company in 1873. A century later, funds from the Adolph Coors Jr. Trust were used to create the Adolph Coors Foundation as a private family foundation. Family patriarch Joseph Coors backed Paul Weyrich's plan to establish a new conservative think tank called the Heritage Foundation in 1973. Later, Joseph Coors, who died in March 2003, also provided Weyrich with the seed money to create the Committee for the Survival of the Free Congress, now known simply as the Free Congress Foundation.5 In the mid-1990s, the Coors family received national scrutiny when an AFL-CIO boycott brought attention to homophobic, racist, and anti-labor practices and statements of the Coors Brewing Company and its owners. To improve its deteriorating public image, the company began to fund minority groups and improve worker conditions. However, the family continued to fund right-wing causes.6 According to researchers Russ Bellant and Chip Berlet, "The pattern of Coors family funding and activism stands in stark contrast to the mainstream image projected by the Coors Brewing Co., whose advertising and funding reach out to African-American, women's, and gay communities."7

Coors family members are active in many of the organizations funded by Castle Rock. Holland Coors, for example, is a board member of the Heritage Foundation and a trustee of the Intercollegiate Studies Institute; Jeffrey Coors is the director of Free Congress Research and Education and a board member of the Independence Institute.8 Over the years CRF has given $2,948,760 to the Heritage Foundation, $350,000 to the Intercollegiate Studies Institute, $1,075,000 to the Free Congress Foundation, and $575,000 to the Independence Institute.9

During fiscal year 2007, the foundation awarded $2,538,000 to a variety of organizations and institutions, including legal foundations, right-wing think tanks, Christian ministries, and educational institutions.10 2007 grantees included the Heritage Foundation, the David Horowitz Freedom Center, the Institute on Religion and Public Life, and the Manhattan Institute. 11 Top grantees since 1993 have included Heritage, Hillsdale College, the Free Congress Research and Education Foundation, Johnson & Wales University, the Adolph Coors Medical Research Foundation, the Episcopal Diocese of Massachusetts, the Mountain States Legal Foundation, the John Wayne Cancer Institute, the Institute for Justice, and the Pacific Legal Foundation.12

Please note: IPS Right Web neither represents nor endorses any of the individuals or groups profiled on this site.

Please click the following link to bookmark this page:


If the link doesn't appear don't worry, your browser doesn't support this function.

Try pressing 'ctrl + d' on a PC or 'cmd + d' if your using a Mac.

Close

    Contact Information

    Castle Rock Foundation
    4100 E. Mississippi Ave., Suite 1850
    Denver, CO 80246
    Phone: 303-388-1683
    E-mail: generalinfo@castlerockfdn.org
    Website: www.castlerockfoundation.org

    Mission
    “Promote a better understanding of the free enterprise system; preserve the principles upon which our democracy was founded to help ensure a limited role for government and the protection of individual rights as provided for in the Constitution; encourage personal responsibility and leadership; and uphold traditional American values.”13

    Key Personnel
    Sally W. Rippe, executive director; John W. Jackson, National Program Advisor. Board of Trustees: William K. Coors, Ambassador Holland Coors, Jeffrey Coors, Peter Coors, and Reverend Robert G. Windsor 14

    Total Assets (2007)15
    $41 million

     

    Revenue (2007) 16
    $1,458,032


    Founded
    1993 

    Top Grantees (1993 to 2007)17

  • Heritage Foundation $2,948,760
  • Hillsdale College $3,205,520
  • Free Congress Research and Education Foundation, Inc. $1,075,000
  • Johnson & Wales University $1,000,000
  • Adolph Coors Medical Research Foundation $1,000,000
  • Episcopal Diocese of Massachusetts $1,000,000
  • Mountain States Legal Foundation $850,000
  • John Wayne Cancer Institute $800,000
  • Institute for Justice $780,000
  • Pacific Legal Foundation $695,000
The Right Web Mission

Right Web tracks militarists’ efforts to influence U.S. foreign policy.

Sources

1.   MediaTransparency.org, http://www.mediatransparency.org/funders/castle_rock.htm; Castle Rock Foundation, http://www.castlerockfoundation.org/; Adolph Coors Foundation, http://coorsfoundation.org/.
2. Castle Rock Foundation, http://www.castlerockfoundation.org/
3. Jeff Krehely, Meaghan House, and Emily Kernan, Axis of Ideology: Conservative Foundations and Public Policy, (National Committee for Responsive Philanthropy. March 2004), pp. 37, 44
4. Jeff Krehely, Meaghan House, and Emily Kernan, Axis of Ideology: Conservative Foundations and Public Policy, (National Committee for Responsive Philanthropy. March 2004), pp. 37, 44
5. Castle Rock Foundation, http://www.castlerockfoundation.org/; Adolph Coors Foundation, http://coorsfoundation.org/; Jeff Krehely, Meaghan House, and Emily Kernan, Axis of Ideology: Conservative Foundations and Public Policy, (National Committee for Responsive Philanthropy. March 2004), pp. 37, 44
6. Jeff Krehely, Meaghan House, and Emily Kernan, Axis of Ideology: Conservative Foundations and Public Policy, (National Committee for Responsive Philanthropy. March 2004), pp. 37, 44
7. Russ Bellant and Chip Berlet, "Still Backing the Hard Right: Coors Money Undermines Democracy."
http://www.corporations.org/coors
8. Jeff Krehely, Meaghan House, and Emily Kernan, Axis of Ideology: Conservative Foundations and Public Policy, (National Committee for Responsive Philanthropy. March 2004), pp. 37, 44; Russ Bellant and Chip Berlet, "Still Backing the Hard Right: Coors Money
9. MediaTransparency.org, http://www.mediatransparency.org/funders/castle_rock.htm; Castle Rock Foundation, 2007 Annual Report, http://www.castlerockfoundation.org/CastleRock AR 2007.pdf
10. Castle Rock Foundation, 2007 Annual Report, http://www.castlerockfoundation.org/CastleRock AR 2007.pdf
11. Castle Rock Foundation, 2007 Annual Report, http://www.castlerockfoundation.org/CastleRock AR 2007.pdf
12. MediaTransparency.org, http://www.mediatransparency.org/funders/castle_rock.htm
13. Castle Rock Foundation, 2007 Annual Report, http://www.castlerockfoundation.org/CastleRock AR 2007.pdf
14. Castle Rock Foundation. Board of Trustees, http://www.castlerockfoundation.org/board.asp
15. Castle Rock Foundation, 2007 Annual Report, http://www.castlerockfoundation.org/CastleRock AR 2007.pdf
16. Castle Rock Foundation, 2007 Annual Report, http://www.castlerockfoundation.org/CastleRock AR 2007.pdf
17. MediaTransparency.org, http://www.mediatransparency.org/funders/castle_rock.htm

Latest Feature Articles
Whither the Liberal Hawks?

Jim Lobe | January 31, 2012

Tehran's threat to close the Strait of Hormuz, coupled with mounting threats from hawks in Israel and the United States, has brought the possibility of war sharply into view. But a number of influential members of the U.S. foreign policy establishment—including several prominent liberal interventionists who supported the invasion of Iraq—are warning against further escalation.

Rise of the Vulcans Redux

Peter Certo | December 19, 2011

The purported “end of the neocon consensus” has hardly meant an end to hawkishness in the GOP fold. With the Republican candidates virtually all gunning for Iran, backing right-wing Israeli policies toward the Palestinians, and stabling a passel of neoconservative advisers (Ron Paul excepted), voters have plenty of clues about what the foreign policy of a new GOP administration would look like. And while some of the candidates have expressed wariness with neoconservative notions of armed democracy promotion, all the signs indicate that if a Republican wins next year, we will likely be in for a bit if George W. redux.

Turning the Tide on the “Pro-Israel” Debate

Michael Flynn and Peter Certo | December 13, 2011

With key members of the "Israel Lobby" acknowledging the importance of providing a broader space to Israel’s critics, the indelibly beltway Politico recognizing the influence of such critics in a full-length feature, and core Democratic organizations showing an increasing sensitivity to inappropriate uses of the anti-Semite charge, is the United States finally willing to undertake a real debate on what are the best U.S. interests in the Middle East?

The China Divide and the Future of the GOP

Robert Farley | November 08, 2011

The issue of whither U.S. relations with China is an important test case for observing the divide between the free market and neoconservative wings of the Republican Party. Thus far, the GOP presidential candidates have largely failed to articulate a vision of China that comes anywhere close to reflecting the complexity of U.S.-Chinese relations. Among the leading candidates, Mitt Romney has arguably been the most aggressive in his discussion of China policy. Yet, his embrace of a hawkish line towards Beijing would appear to indicate that President Obama’s would-be challengers have not yet found an alternative vocabulary for talking and thinking about one of the critical foreign policy issues of the 2012 election. It seems clear that even though neoconservatives lack grassroots support, they offer what is effectively the only option for an “establishment” GOP candidate, a fact that could have lasting impact both on the viability of any Republican Party foreign policy platform as well as future U.S. decision-making vis-à-vis other hotspots like Iran, Israel, and North Korea.

Right Web | rightweb.irc-online.org


1112 16th St. NW, Suite 600,
Washington, DC 20036
USA
|
|
202-234-9382

Except where otherwise noted, content on this site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License

Right Web is a project of the Institute for Policy Studies; www.ips-dc.org