Right Web

PRA's Right Web neither represents nor endorses any of the individuals or groups profiled on this site.

Seth Cropsey is a senior fellow at the neoconservative-led Hudson Institute and a long-time government official who has served in several Republican administrations. The son of a well known acolyte of Leo Strauss—Joseph Cropsey—Cropsey has worked for or supported a number of rightist organizations: He has been a visiting fellow at the American Enterprise Institute; a signatory to various open-letters published by the Project for the New American Century; a program director at the Heritage Foundation; and an editor of the Irving Kristol-founded Public Interest magazine. [1]

A deputy undersecretary of the navy under Presidents Ronald Reagan and George H.W. Bush, Cropsey was appointed during the first George W. Bush administration as head of the International Broadcasting Bureau (IBB), the government entity that oversees the Voice of America, Radio Marti, and other U.S. government international broadcasting programs. According to his Hudson Institute bio, Cropsey managed IBB “as successful efforts were undertaken to increase radio and television broadcasting to the Muslim world.” [2]

Since joining the Hudson Institute, Cropsey has written on a range of security issues for various rightist journals, including the William Kristol-founded Weekly Standard and the Washington Times. Crospey’s writings typically channel neoconservative rhetoric on U.S. foreign and defense policies, championing a hard line on purported threats, promoting increased military spending, and berating the “weakness” of western Europeans. [3]

Shortly after President Barack Obama’s announcement in September 2009 that the United States would not continue to pursue controversial missile defense systems in Poland and the Czech Republic developed by the Bush administration, Cropsey accused the president of “appeasement,” a charge heard from many neoconservatives and other militarists. He wrote in the Weekly Standard, “The Obama administration chose an historic month to appease the Russians by reneging on the U.S. proposal to place ballistic missile defenses in Poland and the Czech Republic. September 1st of 2009 was the 70th anniversary of the Nazis' unprovoked attack on Poland. In the middle of the same month the Red Army invaded Poland--70 years ago to the day. At the end of this month is the 71st anniversary of the Munich agreement in which England and France agreed to allow Hitler to annex large portions of western Czechoslovakia.” [4]

In a June 2009 article for the Weekly Standard, Cropsey blamed President Obama’s June 2009 Cairo speech on Mideast policy for encouraging the likes of Muammar Qaddafi to equate U.S. actions with those of Osama bin Laden. He wrote, “In [the Cairo] speech Obama called the 9/11 attacks ‘an enormous trauma to our country . . . that led us to act contrary to our ideals.’ Specifically, Guantanamo. The president reduced the evil of destroying several thousand innocents to a psychological episode that produced aberrant American behavior. Other parts of the same speech are equally unbalanced. ‘Israel must live up to its obligations’ to allow Palestinians to lead decent lives. However, no such ‘obligation’ exists for Palestinians to recognize Israel's right to exist. No one should be surprised that Qaddafi's remarks followed Obama's so quickly. If the American president sees his international role as a great exhorter with a lot of explaining to do, why shouldn't the leaders of other countries, especially those who share serious misgivings about the role of the United States in the world join the chorus?” [5]

Before being tapped by the Bush administration to direct the IBB, Cropsey was the director of governmental affairs at the Greenberg Traurig law firm, a top lobbying outfit. According to New York Lawyer, Greenberg Traurig’s  lobbying fees “exceeded $8 million in the first half of 2001, the fifth most of any firm in Washington, according to rankings by National Journal.” [6] After Cropsey joined the Bush administration, the law firm’s government relations activities skyrocketed. According to a September 2003 Greenberg Taurig press release, “In the recent semi-annual Lobbying Disclosure Act (LDA) filing, Greenberg Traurig reported nearly $13.5 million in income for their government relations work from January 1 to June 30, 2003, representing a 66 percent increase in revenue compared to last year's $8.14 million. Over the past year, Greenberg represented 108 clients, including city governments, multi-national businesses, non-profit organizations and Native American nations.” [7]