Institute for Policy Studies  –  www.ips-dc.orgPolitical Research Associates

Right Web

Tracking militarists’ efforts to influence U.S. foreign policy

Daniel McKivergan


  • John McCain for President: Campaign staffer
  • Weekly Standard: Former Online Editor
  • Project for the New American Century: Former Deputy Director

Please note: IPS Right Web neither represents nor endorses any of the individuals or groups profiled on this site.

Daniel McKivergan, former deputy director of the Project for the New American Century (PNAC), is a policy analyst and writer closely associated with Sen. John McCain (R-AZ), for whom he has served as a campaign adviser. Through perches at outfits like the Weekly Standard, McKivergan has hyped threats from a number of countries, including Russia and Iran, often promoting interventionist U.S. strategies.

After graduating from the College of the Holy Cross in 1988, McKivergan joined the staff of the Republican National Committee (RNC), working in the research department first as an analyst and later as its director. McKivergan left the RNC in 1993 for the Project for the Republican Future, a Washington, DC, think tank that served as a precursor organization to PNAC. He is also listed as a deputy director from 2003 to 2005 of the New Citizenship Project, which is credited as being the sponsor of PNAC (see Media Transparency, "New Citizenship Project, Inc."). According to Media Transparency, others affiliated with NCP include Gary Schmitt (president); Randy Scheunemann, Bruce Jackson, and Robert Kagan (directors); Ellen Bork and Thomas Donnelly (deputy directors); and William Kristol (chairman).

McKivergan became research director for the neoconservative magazine the Weekly Standard in 1995, where he worked for two years. While McKivergan was working at the Standard, magazine founder Bill Kristol took note of him as a "young protégé" (New Republic, October 16, 2006). When Senator McCain, a regular reader of the Standard, approached Kristol about needing a new legislative aide, Kristol recommended McKivergan for the job. McKivergan joined McCain's staff as legislative director in 2000, following a brief stint working as legislative director for Rep. Dan Miller (R-FL), and two years' time at the Philanthropy Roundtable, for which he served as both policy director and associate editor of its magazine, Philanthropy.

In 2002, McKivergan became deputy director of PNAC, where he joined a chorus of neoconservative pundits in arguing that deposing Saddam Hussein was necessary to win the "war on terror." In October 2002, he authored a memo titled "War on Terrorism and American Statecraft," addressed to "opinion leaders." The memo directed their attention to recent articles about a potential war with Iraq, including "A Necessary War: Unless Saddam Hussein is Removed, the War on Terrorism Will Fail," by American Enterprise Institute fellow Reuel Marc Gerecht, and a Washington Post piece titled, "From Truth to Deception," by William Kristol, who was also PNAC chairman.

After the United States failed to find weapons of mass destruction in Iraq, McKivergan continued to argue that there had been substantial evidence that Hussein had been stockpiling WMD leading up to the war (see Daniel McKivergan, "The Worst of Intentions: What Saddam's Iraq Was Up To," Weekly Standard, July 1, 2005). He was also a signatory of a January 2005 PNAC "Letter to Congress" calling for lawmakers to approve an increase in U.S. ground forces of 25,000 active duty troops per year ("Letter to Congress").

McKivergan left PNAC in 2005 to work as the online foreign editor for the Weekly Standard, where he continued to espouse his hawkish, conservative opinion on the Iraq War. "It's important to remember that terror attacks against the United States didn't start the day our troops entered Baghdad, and they won't end if we leave Iraq to the terrorists," McKivergan wrote in October 2006 for Worldwide Standard, the blog of the Weekly Standard (McKivergan 2006).

In November 2006, commenting on the mid-term elections, McKivergan focused a blog entry on Sen. Joe Lieberman (I-CT): "Lieberman wins, and he did so without compromising his position on Iraq. Indeed, he defended it," McKivergan wrote. "[S]ome Democratic strategists were privately advising him to trim his support for the war. He ignored them. Good for Joe" (Pittsburgh Tribune Review, November 12, 2006).

Until he left the Weekly Standard in 2007 to join the McCain campaign team, McKivergan often posted articles on the Standard's blog, arguing that Iran is developing the capacity to produce nuclear weapons and that the only question is how long it will be before these weapons appear (McKivergan, April 2006). A January 2006 post drew parallels between Hussein and Ahmedinejad, with the title, "Saddam Close to Having a Nuke in '91; Today, Iran Follows Saddam's Nuclear Procurement Playbook" (Daniel McKivergan, "Iran 'Fantasies' at the New York Times?" WorldwideStandard.com, April 11, 2006 ).

Please note: IPS Right Web neither represents nor endorses any of the individuals or groups profiled on this site.

Please click the following link to bookmark this page:


If the link doesn't appear don't worry, your browser doesn't support this function.

Try pressing 'ctrl + d' on a PC or 'cmd + d' if your using a Mac.

Close
    Affiliations

  • John McCain for President: Campaign Staffer
  • Philanthropy Roundtable: Policy Director
  • Project for the New American Century: Former Deputy Director
  • Project for the Republican Future: Former Staffer
  • Republican National Committee: Former Research Department Analyst and Director
  • Weekly Standard: Former Online Foreign Editor and Contributor
  • Wounded Warrior Project: Member, Board of Directors


  • Government Service

  • Office of Rep. Dan Miller (R-FL): Former Legislative Director
  • Office of Sen. John McCain (R-AZ): Former Legislative Director
  • U.S. Coast Guard Reserve: 1985-1989


  • Education

  • College of the Holy Cross: 1988
  • Johns Hopkins University: Degree and year unspecified


Daniel McKivergan News Feed

Right Web is not responsible for the content of external internet sites.

The Right Web Mission

Right Web tracks militarists’ efforts to influence U.S. foreign policy.

Sources
"Best of the Blogs," Pittsburgh Tribune Review, November 12, 2006.

Ellen S. Conte, "Class Notes: 1988," Holy Cross Magazine, vol. 34, Fall 2000, p. 60.

Project for the New American Century, "Daniel McKivergan," Biography, http://www.newamericancentury.org/danielmckiverganbio.htm.

Daniel McKivergan, "Iran 'Fantasies' at the New York Times?" WorldwideStandard.com, April 11, 2006, http://www.weeklystandard.com/weblogs/TWSFP/2006/04/iran_fantasies_at_the_new_york_1.html.

Daniel McKivergan, "Saddam Came Close to Having a Nuke in '91," WorldWideStandard.com, January 13, 2006, http://www.weeklystandard.com/weblogs/TWSFP/2006/01/saddam_came_close_to_having_a.html.

Daniel McKivergan, "The Worst of Intentions: What Saddam's Iraq Was Up To," Weekly Standard, July 1, 2005, http://www.weeklystandard.com/Content/Public/Articles/000/000/005/783pliue.asp.

Media Transparency, "New Citizenship Project, Inc.," http://www.mediatransparency.org/recipientpersonroles.php?recipientID=258.

Daniel McKivergan, "War on Terrorism and American Statecraft," Project for a New American Century, October 15, 2002, http://www.newamericancentury.org/iraq-101502.htm.

John Judis, "Neo-McCain," New Republic, October 16, 2006.

Kristen Samuelson, "In Other Words: A Sampling of Opinions," Chicago Tribune, October 2, 2006.

Project for the New American Century, "Letter to Congress on Increasing U.S. Ground Forces," January 28, 2005, http://www.newamericancentury.org/defense-20050128.htm.
Latest Feature Articles
Whither the Liberal Hawks?

Jim Lobe | January 31, 2012

Tehran's threat to close the Strait of Hormuz, coupled with mounting threats from hawks in Israel and the United States, has brought the possibility of war sharply into view. But a number of influential members of the U.S. foreign policy establishment—including several prominent liberal interventionists who supported the invasion of Iraq—are warning against further escalation.

Rise of the Vulcans Redux

Peter Certo | December 19, 2011

The purported “end of the neocon consensus” has hardly meant an end to hawkishness in the GOP fold. With the Republican candidates virtually all gunning for Iran, backing right-wing Israeli policies toward the Palestinians, and stabling a passel of neoconservative advisers (Ron Paul excepted), voters have plenty of clues about what the foreign policy of a new GOP administration would look like. And while some of the candidates have expressed wariness with neoconservative notions of armed democracy promotion, all the signs indicate that if a Republican wins next year, we will likely be in for a bit if George W. redux.

Turning the Tide on the “Pro-Israel” Debate

Michael Flynn and Peter Certo | December 13, 2011

With key members of the "Israel Lobby" acknowledging the importance of providing a broader space to Israel’s critics, the indelibly beltway Politico recognizing the influence of such critics in a full-length feature, and core Democratic organizations showing an increasing sensitivity to inappropriate uses of the anti-Semite charge, is the United States finally willing to undertake a real debate on what are the best U.S. interests in the Middle East?

The China Divide and the Future of the GOP

Robert Farley | November 08, 2011

The issue of whither U.S. relations with China is an important test case for observing the divide between the free market and neoconservative wings of the Republican Party. Thus far, the GOP presidential candidates have largely failed to articulate a vision of China that comes anywhere close to reflecting the complexity of U.S.-Chinese relations. Among the leading candidates, Mitt Romney has arguably been the most aggressive in his discussion of China policy. Yet, his embrace of a hawkish line towards Beijing would appear to indicate that President Obama’s would-be challengers have not yet found an alternative vocabulary for talking and thinking about one of the critical foreign policy issues of the 2012 election. It seems clear that even though neoconservatives lack grassroots support, they offer what is effectively the only option for an “establishment” GOP candidate, a fact that could have lasting impact both on the viability of any Republican Party foreign policy platform as well as future U.S. decision-making vis-à-vis other hotspots like Iran, Israel, and North Korea.

Right Web | rightweb.irc-online.org


1112 16th St. NW, Suite 600,
Washington, DC 20036
USA
|
|
202-234-9382

Except where otherwise noted, content on this site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License

Right Web is a project of the Institute for Policy Studies; www.ips-dc.org