Institute for Policy Studies  –  www.ips-dc.orgPolitical Research Associates

Right Web

Tracking militarists’ efforts to influence U.S. foreign policy

Laurent Murawiec


    Hudson Institute: Senior Fellow
    Rand Corporation:
    Former Analyst
    Committee on the Present Danger:
    Member

Please note: IPS Right Web neither represents nor endorses any of the individuals or groups profiled on this site.

Laurent Murawiec is a senior fellow at the rightist Hudson Institute, a member of the Committee on the Present Danger, a former analyst for the Rand Corporation, and the ex-editor of the Executive Intelligence Review, a magazine founded by Lyndon LaRouche, the controversial conspiracist and serial campaigner for the presidency. A proponent of aggressive U.S. policies in the Middle East in the wake of 9/11, including attacking a number of countries and taking over oil fields, Murawiec's track record also includes advising the French Ministry of Defense, working as a foreign correspondent in Europe, and teaching history at Paris' Ecole des Hautes Etudes en Sciences Sociales (for more on his background, see "Laurent Murawiec," Hudson Institute).

Murawiec came to public attention after he delivered a July 2002 PowerPoint presentation to the Defense Policy Board (DPB) --a panel that advises the Pentagon on strategy and policy that was led at the time by Richard Perle --in which he argued that U.S. grand strategy in the Middle East must see Iraq as the "tactical pivot," Saudi Arabia as the "strategic pivot," and Egypt as the "prize." Regarding Saudi Arabia, Murawiec argued that the House of Saud is "hated throughout the Arab world: lazy, overbearing, dishonest, corrupt." To effect change in Saudi Arabia-which he called the "the kernel of evil, the prime mover, the most dangerous opponent"--Murawiec suggested that the United States threaten holy sites, take control of oil fields, and confiscate financial assets in the United States. Ultimately, if the country did not stop funding fundamentalist schools and terrorist outfits, the United States should threaten the House of Saud itself (Laurent Murawiec, "Taking Saudi out of Arabia"; see also, "Briefing Depicted Saudis as Enemies," Washington Post).

The presentation, which first came to light in an August 6, 2002 Washington Post report, spurred a tumult of criticism, prompting then Secretary of State Colin Powell to assure the Saudi foreign minister that the presentation had no bearing on U.S. policy and Richard Perle to issue an excuse to Time magazine (August 19, 2002), arguing that he had no idea what Murawiec was planning to say. George Washington University's Elliott School of International Affairs, where Murawiec briefly served on the faculty, abruptly took down its biography of Murawiec from its website, although it claimed the move had nothing to do with the presentation ("The Continuing Saga of Laurent (of Arabia) Murawiec," Slate.com, August 27, 2002).

Murawiec, however, stuck by his PowerPoint presentation, telling a Middle East business reporter: "My experience of your part of the world is that most people hate the Saudis' guts, not to make too fine a point about it. Everybody knows they are a bunch of lazy assholes that are arrogant, too big for their shoes, which behave in a consistently disgusting manner. People in your region have told me that for 20 years. But I am not telling you anything new." After the online news service ITP.net posted the remark, Murawiec denied he had made it, telling Agence France-Presse: "I gave no interview neither to that guy ... nor to anybody. The whole story is spurious and void." ITP.net subsequently released the recorded conversation. When asked by Slate.com about the episode, Murawiec referred questions to his employer at the time, the Rand Corp. In response, Rand released a brief statement from its president, James Thompson, who said: "The comments on the tape recording on the website ITP.net are offensive and repugnant, and Rand repudiates them in the strongest terms. Rand was unaware of these comments until they were reported by ITP.net" ("The Continuing Saga of Laurent (of Arabia) Murawiec," Slate.com, August 27, 2002).

One group that apparently did not take offense to Murawiec's views was the neoconservatives. In November 2002, Murawiec briefed Daniel Pipes' Middle East Forum with his ideas on terrorism and the U.S.-Saudi relationship. Soon after, Murawiec became a fellow at the Hudson Institute, a U.S. think tank known for its promotion of hawkish, Israel-centric U.S. foreign polices and close association with leading neoconservatives like Norman Podhoretz, Irwin Stelzer, and Meyrav Wurmser.

Murawiec's biography on the Hudson website claims that his "main research areas concern the application of anthropology to strategy, the 'Revolution in Military Affairs,' and information warfare." Describing his past research and publications, the biography states: "Murawiec has translated Clausewitz's On War into French (Perrin, 1999), as well as works by G. von Scharnhorst. His book La Guerre au XXI

Please note: IPS Right Web neither represents nor endorses any of the individuals or groups profiled on this site.

Please click the following link to bookmark this page:


If the link doesn't appear don't worry, your browser doesn't support this function.

Try pressing 'ctrl + d' on a PC or 'cmd + d' if your using a Mac.

Close
    Affiliations

  • The Hudson Institute: Senior Fellow (2003-current)
  • Committee on the Present Danger: Member
  • Intelligence Summit: Speaker, 2007; Participant, 2005
  • Rand Corporation: Former Senior International Policy Analyst
  • La Vie Francaise: Former Foreign Correspondent
  • George Washington University School of International Affairs: Former Professor
  • Executive Intelligence Review: Former Editor
  • Middle East Forum: Presented Briefing, 2002
  • Ecole des Hautes Etudes en Sciences Sociales: Former Teacher


  • Government Service

  • U.S. Defense Department, Defense Policy Board: Guest Speaker
  • French Ministry of Defense: Former Adviser
  • Private Sector

  • GeoPol Services S.A.: Cofounder and Former Manager
  • Education

  • Sorbonne University (Paris): B.A.; M.A.in Philosophy


Laurent Murawiec News Feed
The 'Cairo 19′ Got What They Deserve - Antiwar.com

Right Web is not responsible for the content of external internet sites.

The Right Web Mission

Right Web tracks militarists’ efforts to influence U.S. foreign policy.

Sources
The Hudson Institute: Staff Bio: Laurent Murawiec
http://www.hudson.org/learn/index.cfm?fuseaction=staff_bio&eid=Murawiec.

Laurent Murawiec, "Taking Saudi out of Arabia," slide presentation delivered to the Defense Policy Board, July 10, 2002, available at Slate.com, http://www.slate.com/?id=2069119#powerpoint.

"The PowerPoint that Rocked the Pentagon," Slate.com, August 7, 2002
http://slate.msn.com//?id=2069119.

Jack Shafer, "The Continuing Saga of Laurent (of Arabia) Murawiec," Slate.com, August 27, 2002.

Thomas Ricks, "Briefing Depicted Saudis as Enemies," Washington Post, August 6, 2002.

Mark Thompson, "Inside the Secret War Council," Time magazine, August 19, 2002.

"Saudi Arabia's Links to Terrorism," Briefing by Laurent Murawiec for the Middle East Forum, November 19, 2002.

About The Mind of Jihad, Cambridge University Press catalogue, http://www.cambridge.org/us/catalogue/catalogue.asp?isbn=0521883938.

Jamie Glazov, "Pandora's Boxes: Interview with Laurent Murawiec," FrontPageMag.com, July 24, 2007, http://www.frontpagemag.com/Articles/Read.aspx?GUID=ffca3a1f-6b55-4f25-94db-16b1f5a7b26b.

Laurent Murawiec, "Deterring Those Who Are Already Dead?" Center for Strategic Studies Bar-Ilan University in Israel, May 25, 2006.

Committee on the Present Danger, Members, http://www.committeeonthepresentdanger.org/OurMembers/tabid/364/Default.aspx.

The Intelligence Summit, Speakers & Organizers, http://www.intelligencesummit.org/speakers/LaurentMurawiec.php.

Support IRC's Work

For media inquiries, email rightweb@publiceye.org or call (617) 666-5300.


 
Latest Feature Articles
Whither the Liberal Hawks?

Jim Lobe | January 31, 2012

Tehran's threat to close the Strait of Hormuz, coupled with mounting threats from hawks in Israel and the United States, has brought the possibility of war sharply into view. But a number of influential members of the U.S. foreign policy establishment—including several prominent liberal interventionists who supported the invasion of Iraq—are warning against further escalation.

Rise of the Vulcans Redux

Peter Certo | December 19, 2011

The purported “end of the neocon consensus” has hardly meant an end to hawkishness in the GOP fold. With the Republican candidates virtually all gunning for Iran, backing right-wing Israeli policies toward the Palestinians, and stabling a passel of neoconservative advisers (Ron Paul excepted), voters have plenty of clues about what the foreign policy of a new GOP administration would look like. And while some of the candidates have expressed wariness with neoconservative notions of armed democracy promotion, all the signs indicate that if a Republican wins next year, we will likely be in for a bit if George W. redux.

Turning the Tide on the “Pro-Israel” Debate

Michael Flynn and Peter Certo | December 13, 2011

With key members of the "Israel Lobby" acknowledging the importance of providing a broader space to Israel’s critics, the indelibly beltway Politico recognizing the influence of such critics in a full-length feature, and core Democratic organizations showing an increasing sensitivity to inappropriate uses of the anti-Semite charge, is the United States finally willing to undertake a real debate on what are the best U.S. interests in the Middle East?

The China Divide and the Future of the GOP

Robert Farley | November 08, 2011

The issue of whither U.S. relations with China is an important test case for observing the divide between the free market and neoconservative wings of the Republican Party. Thus far, the GOP presidential candidates have largely failed to articulate a vision of China that comes anywhere close to reflecting the complexity of U.S.-Chinese relations. Among the leading candidates, Mitt Romney has arguably been the most aggressive in his discussion of China policy. Yet, his embrace of a hawkish line towards Beijing would appear to indicate that President Obama’s would-be challengers have not yet found an alternative vocabulary for talking and thinking about one of the critical foreign policy issues of the 2012 election. It seems clear that even though neoconservatives lack grassroots support, they offer what is effectively the only option for an “establishment” GOP candidate, a fact that could have lasting impact both on the viability of any Republican Party foreign policy platform as well as future U.S. decision-making vis-à-vis other hotspots like Iran, Israel, and North Korea.

Right Web | rightweb.irc-online.org


1112 16th St. NW, Suite 600,
Washington, DC 20036
USA
|
|
202-234-9382

Except where otherwise noted, content on this site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License

Right Web is a project of the Institute for Policy Studies; www.ips-dc.org