Institute for Policy Studies  –  www.ips-dc.orgPolitical Research Associates

Right Web

Tracking militarists’ efforts to influence U.S. foreign policy

One Jerusalem


Please note: IPS Right Web neither represents nor endorses any of the individuals or groups profiled on this site.

One Jerusalem, a rightist New York-based organization devoted to maintaining a united Jerusalem as the capitol of Israel, was originally created in 2000 to combat peace proposals pushed by then Prime Minister Ehud Barak. According to its website, One Jerusalem, which counts among its leaders rightist Israeli figures like Natan Sharansky and Benajmin Netanyahu, held its inaugural event in January 2001. The group claimed it was "the largest rally in the history of Jerusalem. More than 400,000 people filled the hills around Jerusalem's Old City for an unprecedented demonstration of support for Israel's beleaguered capital city, just four months after the launch of a deadly Palestinian-Arab assault against the Jewish state. The world watched as the people pledged their allegiance to the preservation of Jerusalem as the eternal, unified capital of the State of Israel."

A supporter of hardline Likudnik policies regarding Mideast peace, One Jerusalem has also supported much of the George W. Bush administration's rhetoric regarding the "war on terror." Its online forum and news service frequently post opinions hawking threats from countries like Iran and Syria. On November 14, 2007, One Jerusalem held an "exclusive bloggers conference call" with former U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations John Bolton, in which he discussed his 2007 book Surrender is Not an Option. "We urge you to buy this important book, written by a great American," the blog appealed.

During the lead up to the Annapolis peace talks in November 2007, which were pushed by both the Bush administration and the government of Israel Prime Minister Ehud Olmert, One Jerusalem launched a well-funded campaign attacking the talks. One Jerusalem opposed the talks because the Israeli government was considering ceding some Arab parts of Jerusalem to Palestinians in order to reach an agreed peace. According to the Israeli Ynet.com news service (November 25, 2007), U.S. businessman Ronald Lauder, a scion of the Estee Lauder cosmetics empire, provided funding for the $1 million anti-Annapolis campaign.

According to the Jerusalem Post, One Jerusalem's campaign, spearheaded by Sharansky, "will include radio and newspaper advertisements, special bus tours of Jerusalem in the coming weeks for tens of thousands of Israelis, an interactive Internet site, and the distribution of golden ribbons for the unity of Jerusalem—a spin-off of the orange ribbon used by the settlement movement" (Jerusalem Post, November 21, 2007). Voice of America had further details: "Israeli right-wing activists have launched the 'One Jerusalem' campaign, demanding that Prime Minister Ehud Olmert will not make concessions on the Holy City at this week's peace conference in the United States. Activists are passing out half a million gold ribbons at intersections, urging Israelis to tie them to their cars in solidarity with a united Jerusalem" (VOA, November 25, 2007).

Before the Annapolis talks began, One Jerusalem also posted on its homepage a report titled "Olmert to World Jewry: Shut Up." The report derided the prime minister for allegedly ignoring the opinions of "world Jewry," arguing: "It is clear that Olmert, who has the support of about 5% of the Israeli electorate, sees himself as the sole voice on the future of the capital of the Jewish people. His contemptuous remarks are in sharp contrast to the views of [David] Ben-Gurion, [Menachem] Begin, Sharansky, and [Yitzhak] Rabin. While he is willing to bend to the wishes of Israel's enemies who are demanding Jerusalem as their capital he is not interested in what world Jewry has to say."

Aside from private individual donors like Lauder, One Jerusalem receives support from the New York-based One Jerusalem Charitable and Educational Fund, which according to its 2006 Form 990 tax return, "operates exclusively to perform and to assist in carrying out the charitable and educational purposes and functions of One Jerusalem, Ltd., an organization exempt under IRC section 501(c)(4), in order to provide the public with full and fair information about the danger of Jerusalem being divided." Between 2002 and 2005, the foundation, which in 2005 was led by Allen Roth and Nelson Warfield, provided more than $675,000 to One Jerusalem.

Please note: IPS Right Web neither represents nor endorses any of the individuals or groups profiled on this site.

Sources
One Jerusalem, http://www.onejerusalem.org.

Ofer Petersburg, "Ron Lauder Funding Campaign Against Division of Jerusalem," Ynetnews.com, November 25, 2007.

"Audio: Ambassador John Bolton—Patriot," November 14, 2007, http://www.onejerusalem.org/blog/archives/2007/11/ambassador_john.asp.

"Olmert to World Jewry: Shut Up," One Jerusalem, November 27, 2007.

Etgar Lefkovits, "Sharansky Launches Public Campaign to Thwart Plan to Divide Jerusalem," Jerusalem Post, November 21, 2007, p. 2.

Voice of America News, "Jerusalem Issue Looms Large at Annapolis Peace Conference," November 25, 2007.

One Jerusalem Charitable and Educational Fund, 2006 Form 990, available from Guidestar.org.
Latest Feature Articles
Whither the Liberal Hawks?

Jim Lobe | January 31, 2012

Tehran's threat to close the Strait of Hormuz, coupled with mounting threats from hawks in Israel and the United States, has brought the possibility of war sharply into view. But a number of influential members of the U.S. foreign policy establishment—including several prominent liberal interventionists who supported the invasion of Iraq—are warning against further escalation.

Rise of the Vulcans Redux

Peter Certo | December 19, 2011

The purported “end of the neocon consensus” has hardly meant an end to hawkishness in the GOP fold. With the Republican candidates virtually all gunning for Iran, backing right-wing Israeli policies toward the Palestinians, and stabling a passel of neoconservative advisers (Ron Paul excepted), voters have plenty of clues about what the foreign policy of a new GOP administration would look like. And while some of the candidates have expressed wariness with neoconservative notions of armed democracy promotion, all the signs indicate that if a Republican wins next year, we will likely be in for a bit if George W. redux.

Turning the Tide on the “Pro-Israel” Debate

Michael Flynn and Peter Certo | December 13, 2011

With key members of the "Israel Lobby" acknowledging the importance of providing a broader space to Israel’s critics, the indelibly beltway Politico recognizing the influence of such critics in a full-length feature, and core Democratic organizations showing an increasing sensitivity to inappropriate uses of the anti-Semite charge, is the United States finally willing to undertake a real debate on what are the best U.S. interests in the Middle East?

The China Divide and the Future of the GOP

Robert Farley | November 08, 2011

The issue of whither U.S. relations with China is an important test case for observing the divide between the free market and neoconservative wings of the Republican Party. Thus far, the GOP presidential candidates have largely failed to articulate a vision of China that comes anywhere close to reflecting the complexity of U.S.-Chinese relations. Among the leading candidates, Mitt Romney has arguably been the most aggressive in his discussion of China policy. Yet, his embrace of a hawkish line towards Beijing would appear to indicate that President Obama’s would-be challengers have not yet found an alternative vocabulary for talking and thinking about one of the critical foreign policy issues of the 2012 election. It seems clear that even though neoconservatives lack grassroots support, they offer what is effectively the only option for an “establishment” GOP candidate, a fact that could have lasting impact both on the viability of any Republican Party foreign policy platform as well as future U.S. decision-making vis-à-vis other hotspots like Iran, Israel, and North Korea.

Right Web | rightweb.irc-online.org


1112 16th St. NW, Suite 600,
Washington, DC 20036
USA
|
|
202-234-9382

Except where otherwise noted, content on this site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License

Right Web is a project of the Institute for Policy Studies; www.ips-dc.org