Institute for Policy Studies  –  www.ips-dc.orgPolitical Research Associates

Right Web

Tracking militarists’ efforts to influence U.S. foreign policy

John Tkacik Jr.


    Heritage Foundation: Research fellow
    Project for the New American Century: Signatory

Please note: IPS Right Web neither represents nor endorses any of the individuals or groups profiled on this site.

Highlights & Quotes John Tkacik is a Heritage Foundation China scholar and a signatory to the Project for the New American Century's 2002 letter to President Bush on Hong Kong, which warned of increasing "central Chinese government control over key levers of power" in Hong Kong.

In response to a May 2003 Council on Foreign Relations report which argued that China didn't pose much of a military threat to U.S. interests, Tkacik said: "It's sort of a feel-good report. It doesn't jibe with a Pentagon report last year. And it's a mistake to underestimate the Chinese ability to amass a high quality military force closeto their shores." (Washington Post, May 23, 2003)

In December 2003, after President Bush warned Taiwan not to rock the boat in its relations with China by holding a controversial referendum on independence, Tkacik joined a chorus of neocon and rightwing hawks-including PNAC directors William Kristol, Robert Kagan, and Gary Schmitt-in lambasting the president's position. Tkacik told the Post that the president had "lost his bearings" on Taiwan. "It just boggles the mind. I'm just appalled. Clinton never would have gone this far." (Washington Post, December 9, 2003)

According to his Heritage bio: "A 23-year veteran of the U.S. State Department, John Tkacik joined the Asian Studies Center of The Heritage Foundation in 2001. As a research fellow in the foundation's Asian Studies Center, Tkacik (pronounced TASS-ick) analyzes policies and events concerning China, Taiwan, Hong Kong and Macao. Tkacik's long career in the Department of State began in 1971. After stints in Taiwan and Hong Kong, he came stateside in 1986 to direct junior officer training at the department's Foreign Service Institute in Washington, DC, where he also taught diplomatic history, trade, and analysis. He returned to the Orient in 1989 as Deputy U.S. Consul General in Guangzhou, China. While stationed there, he oversaw all U.S. governmental reporting on economic, commercial and political developments throughout the four provinces of South China. In 1992 he went back to Washington to serve as the State Department's Chief of China Analysis. In this post he supervised the analysis, preparation, and distribution of intelligence reports addressing economic, commercial, military, political, and strategic developments within China. Tkacik left the Department in 1994 to become president of China Business Intelligence, an Alexandria, Virginia, research firm providing intelligence support to U.S. companies doing business with China and Taiwan. Additionally, he served as publisher of Taiwan Weekly Business Bulletin, a newsletter produced for China Online and the U.S.-ROC (Taiwan) Business Council."

Please note: IPS Right Web neither represents nor endorses any of the individuals or groups profiled on this site.

Please click the following link to bookmark this page:


If the link doesn't appear don't worry, your browser doesn't support this function.

Try pressing 'ctrl + d' on a PC or 'cmd + d' if your using a Mac.

Close
    Institutional Affiliations

  • The Heritage Foundation: Research Fellow in China Policy (2001-current) (1)
  • Project for a New American Century: Letter on Hong Kong: Signatory (2002) (2)
  • Taiwan Weekly Business Bulletin: Former Publisher


  • Government Posts/Panels/Commissions

  • U.S. Department of State: Director of Junior Officer Training at Foreign Service Institute (1986-1989); Deputy U.S. Consul General in Guangzhou, China (1989-1992); Chief of China Analysis (1992-1994) (1)
  • Corporate Connections/Business Interests

  • China Business Intelligence: President (1994-current) (1)
  • Education

  • Georgetown University: Bachelors in international relations (1)
  • Harvard University: Masters in public administration (1)


The Right Web Mission

Right Web tracks militarists’ efforts to influence U.S. foreign policy.

Sources
(1) The Heritage Foundation: Staff: John J. Tkacik, Jr.
http://www.heritage.org/About/Staff/JohnTkacik.cfm

(2) Project for a New American Century, Letter on Hong Kong, November 2002
http://www.newamericancentury.org/hongkong-20021126.htm
Latest Feature Articles
Whither the Liberal Hawks?

Jim Lobe | January 31, 2012

Tehran's threat to close the Strait of Hormuz, coupled with mounting threats from hawks in Israel and the United States, has brought the possibility of war sharply into view. But a number of influential members of the U.S. foreign policy establishment—including several prominent liberal interventionists who supported the invasion of Iraq—are warning against further escalation.

Rise of the Vulcans Redux

Peter Certo | December 19, 2011

The purported “end of the neocon consensus” has hardly meant an end to hawkishness in the GOP fold. With the Republican candidates virtually all gunning for Iran, backing right-wing Israeli policies toward the Palestinians, and stabling a passel of neoconservative advisers (Ron Paul excepted), voters have plenty of clues about what the foreign policy of a new GOP administration would look like. And while some of the candidates have expressed wariness with neoconservative notions of armed democracy promotion, all the signs indicate that if a Republican wins next year, we will likely be in for a bit if George W. redux.

Turning the Tide on the “Pro-Israel” Debate

Michael Flynn and Peter Certo | December 13, 2011

With key members of the "Israel Lobby" acknowledging the importance of providing a broader space to Israel’s critics, the indelibly beltway Politico recognizing the influence of such critics in a full-length feature, and core Democratic organizations showing an increasing sensitivity to inappropriate uses of the anti-Semite charge, is the United States finally willing to undertake a real debate on what are the best U.S. interests in the Middle East?

The China Divide and the Future of the GOP

Robert Farley | November 08, 2011

The issue of whither U.S. relations with China is an important test case for observing the divide between the free market and neoconservative wings of the Republican Party. Thus far, the GOP presidential candidates have largely failed to articulate a vision of China that comes anywhere close to reflecting the complexity of U.S.-Chinese relations. Among the leading candidates, Mitt Romney has arguably been the most aggressive in his discussion of China policy. Yet, his embrace of a hawkish line towards Beijing would appear to indicate that President Obama’s would-be challengers have not yet found an alternative vocabulary for talking and thinking about one of the critical foreign policy issues of the 2012 election. It seems clear that even though neoconservatives lack grassroots support, they offer what is effectively the only option for an “establishment” GOP candidate, a fact that could have lasting impact both on the viability of any Republican Party foreign policy platform as well as future U.S. decision-making vis-à-vis other hotspots like Iran, Israel, and North Korea.

Right Web | rightweb.irc-online.org


1112 16th St. NW, Suite 600,
Washington, DC 20036
USA
|
|
202-234-9382

Except where otherwise noted, content on this site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License

Right Web is a project of the Institute for Policy Studies; www.ips-dc.org