Institute for Policy Studies  –  www.ips-dc.orgPolitical Research Associates

Right Web

Tracking militarists’ efforts to influence U.S. foreign policy

American Conservative Union


Please note: IPS Right Web neither represents nor endorses any of the individuals or groups profiled on this site.

The American Conservative Union (ACU), "the nation's oldest and largest conservative grassroots lobbying organization," was founded in 1964 by William F. Buckley and several other leading right-wing figures "to effectively communicate and advance the goals and principles of conservatism through one multi-issue, umbrella organization. ACU’s statement of principles expresses the doctrine of original intent of the framers of the Constitution, traditional moral values, and a strong national defense." [1]

Although largely focused on domestic policy issues, the ACU has a long track record of supporting militarist foreign and defense policies.

During the Cold War, ACU participated in a number of hardline advocacy efforts as a member of the Coalition for Peace through Strength and actively supported rightist groups in Latin America and elsewhere, including the Nicaraguan Contras. [2]

Although some of its members were initially unenthusiastic over the George W. Bush administration's decision to invade Iraq after the 9/11 terrorist attacks, the organization was generally supportive of the administration's “war on terror.”

After a Pentagon-sponsored visit to Iraq in late 2003, ACU Vice Chairman Donald Devine wrote a naively optimistic op-ed for the Washington Times in which he assured readers that the war was soon coming to an end. He wrote, "I had been opposed to United States ground forces in Iraq but was impressed that Secretary Donald Rumsfeld had insisted that the number of American troops on the ground be limited—only enough to win the war but not so many to become bogged down afterwards. … But, with the pressure from influential U.S. voices to increase troop levels substantially and to remain indefinitely until a functioning democracy could be created, I signed up for the rigors of the trip to the combat zone to learn whether the secretary's message had reached the troops. The news from Iraq is good. The end of the U.S. occupation is in sight and the military and civilian leaders are moving enthusiastically and rationally to implement the plan.” [3]

Since the election of President Barack Obama, the group has focused mainly on domestic policy, including efforts to push the Republican Party further right and contest Obama’s health care initiative and economic bailout program. This domestic focus was highlighted during the ACU’s annual Conservative Political Action Conference, which is considered one of the premier right-wing events.

A highlight of the 2009 conference, held shortly after President Obama’s inauguration, was right-wing radio pundit Rush Limbaugh’s declaration that he hoped the new president would “fail.” The audience gave Limbaugh loud ovations when he said, “This notion that I want the president to fail, this shows you the problem we've got. This is nothing more than common sense. … [Democrats] hoped George Bush failed. So what is so strange about being honest and saying I want Barack Obama to fail if his mission is to restructure and reform this country so that capitalism and individual liberty are not its foundation?" [4]

The ACU’s efforts to derail Obama administration initiatives, however, had some controversial results. In mid-July 2009, Politico reported that the group was embroiled in an ethics controversy regarding an alleged “pay-to-play” scheme. Politico secured a letter from ACU to FedEx—then at loggerheads with UPS over Obama-supported regulatory reform—offering to provide lobbying services if the company paid $2-3 million. Shortly after FedEx declined the offer, ACU’s Chairman David Keene contributed his name to a letter addressed to UPS, saying that he and his co-signatories sided with UPS on the issue. [5]

The affair, which Politico’s Mike Allen called “black-and-white proof of the longtime Washington practice known as ‘pay for play,’” [6] was swiftly downplayed by the ACU. In a press release, the group’s vice chairman, Dennis Whitfield, wrote, “David Keene's name was on a letter prepared by another organization. This was a personal decision on his part and he was not representing ACU at the time.” [7]

ACU’s board has included many influential right wing figures, including Jeffrey Bell, former head of the Manhattan Institute and a signatory of the neoconservative Project for the New American Century; Morton Blackwell, a founding member of the secretive Council for National Policy; the NRA's Wayne LaPierre; Jesse Helms; Grover Norquist, Morton Blackwell; and L. Brent Bozell III. [8]



Please note: IPS Right Web neither represents nor endorses any of the individuals or groups profiled on this site.

  • digg.com
  • delicious.com
  • newsvine.com/
  • stumbleupon.com/
Close

Please click the following link to bookmark this page:


If the link doesn't appear don't worry, your browser doesn't support this function.

Try pressing 'ctrl + d' on a PC or 'cmd + d' if your using a Mac.

Close

American Conservative Union Résumé

    Contact Information

    American Conservative Union
    1007 Cameron Street.
    Alexandria, VA 22314.
    Phone: (703) 836-8602.
    Fax: (703) 836-8606
    www.conservative.org

     

    Founded

    • 1964

     

    Leadership (2009)

    • David A. Keene, Chairman
    • Dennis E. Whitfield, Executive Vice President
    • Thomas S. Winter, First Vice Chairman
    • Donald J. Devine, Second Vice Chairman
    • Jameson Campaigne Jr., Secretary

     

    Statement of Principles (2009)

    … We believe that capitalism is the only economic system of our time that is compatible with political liberty. It has not only brought a higher standard of living to a greater number of people than any other economic system in the history of mankind; more important, it has been a decisive instrument in preserving freedom through maintaining private control of economic power and thus limiting the power of government. We believe that collectivism and capitalism are incompatible, and that when government competes with capitalism, it jeopardizes the natural economic growth of our society and the well-being and freedom of the citizenry.

American Conservative Union News Feed

Right Web is not responsible for the content of external internet sites.

The Right Web Mission

Right Web tracks militarists’ efforts to influence U.S. foreign policy.

Sources

1. American Conservative Union, “About ACU,” (accessed July 19, 2009).
2. See the IRC GroupWatch Profile: American Security Council, August 1989.
3. Donald Devine, "Mission to Baghdad," Washington Times, November 12, 2003.
4. Sam Stein, “Rush Limbaugh At CPAC: Doubles Down On Wanting Obama To Fail (VIDEO),” Huffington Post, March 31, 2009.
5. Mike Allen, "Exclusive: Conservative group offers support for $2M,” Politico, July 17, 2009.
6. Mike Allen, "Exclusive: Conservative group offers support for $2M,” Politico, July 17, 2009.
7. American Conservative Union, “Statement from ACU regarding false headline by Washington publication POLITICO,” ACU press release, July 17, 2009.
8. For a list of current board members, see "ACU: Officers, Executive Staff, and Board of Directors".

Latest Feature Articles
Will Israeli Dissent Halt the March towards War?

Jim Lobe | May 03, 2012

Tensions have been reaching near fevered pitch over Iran’s nuclear program as Israeli leaders and their supporters in the United States have pressed for military action to prevent Tehran from developing nuclear weapons. However, a number of factors have been working against the hawks, including recent progress at the P5+1 talks and the lack of enthusiasm for another conflict among a war-weary U.S. public. In recent weeks, a new force has emerged that seems to have made the threat of war even less imminent—the unprecedented wave of dissent from current and former top Israeli officials.

The Militarization of the Syrian Uprising

Samer Araabi | April 18, 2012

As pressure mounts to arm rebels in Syria, there is need for a sober assessment of the costs and consequences of the increasing militarization of the conflict there. If history is any guide, a foreign-backed armed rebellion will likely not produce the kind of victory—or engender the kind of support—that the anti-Assad fighters will require to usher in a new Syria. Additionally, there is the very real possibility that many of the rebels—as we’ve seen in Libya—will turn out to be little better than the regime they seek to replace.

Obama to Pro-Israel Lobby Group: ‘Too Much Loose Talk of War’

Mitchell Plitnick | March 05, 2012

Before a skeptical audience of delegates from the American Israel Public Affairs Committee, President Obama affirmed U.S-Israeli ties and challenged detractors to impugn his administration’s record of support for the Jewish state. However, while insisting that that the United States would consider military options in the event of Iran’s developing a nuclear weapon, he also warned Israeli allies of “loose talk” about war, which Obama said only empowers the Iranian regime and decreases prospects for a diplomatic solution.

Whither the Liberal Hawks?

Jim Lobe | January 31, 2012

Tehran's threat to close the Strait of Hormuz, coupled with mounting threats from hawks in Israel and the United States, has brought the possibility of war sharply into view. But a number of influential members of the U.S. foreign policy establishment—including several prominent liberal interventionists who supported the invasion of Iraq—are warning against further escalation.

Right Web | rightweb.irc-online.org


1112 16th St. NW, Suite 600,
Washington, DC 20036
USA
|
|
202-234-9382

Except where otherwise noted, content on this site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License

Right Web is a project of the Institute for Policy Studies; www.ips-dc.org