Institute for Policy Studies  –  www.ips-dc.orgPolitical Research Associates

Right Web

Tracking militarists’ efforts to influence U.S. foreign policy

Jeffrey Bell


    • American Principles Project: Policy director
    • Project for the New American Century: Signatory
    • American Conservative Union: Board member
    • Manhattan Institute: Former president

Please note: IPS Right Web neither represents nor endorses any of the individuals or groups profiled on this site.

Jeffrey Bell is a longtime social conservative activist and contributor to neoconservative outlets like the Weekly Standard. Bell has worked for a number of right-wing pressure groups and is the former president of the Manhattan Institute. Among the groups he has been associated with are the Project for the New American Century, the American Conservative Union, the Ethics and Public Policy Center, the Foundation for Community and Faith-Centered Enterprise (FCFE), and the Council for National Policy. Bell has twice run for the U.S. Senate, in 1978 and 1982 (he lost both times). He worked as a campaign aide to Presidents Ronald Reagan and Richard Nixon.[1]

As of mid-2010, Bell was the policy director at the American Principles Project (APP), a conservative 501(c)(3) organization whose website describes it as addressing “the rule of law, democracy, limited government and respect for civil liberties, private property and the free market, equality of opportunity, the sanctity of human life, the protection of marriage and the family, and the defense of our nation's sovereignty and security.”[2]

In a 2009 interview with the Weekly Standard, Bell described APP as "an activist group that brings intellectual heft and high tech skills" to policy debates, claiming that there was "a vacuum" on many issues. He said that APP has used the liberal MoveOn.org as a model. “Liberals were nervous about calling for the impeachment investigation of President Clinton to be shut down," said Bell, but then MoveOn landed on the message that the country should "move on,” which caught on quickly. "They hit the sweet spot in how you build up a mass base."[3]

In a September 2010 article for the Standard, Bell argued that despite their very different agendas, Tea Party activists and the social conservative movement overlap considerably and are at heart part of a single broad movement centered on what he terms “America’s founding values.” He wrote, “Given this rootedness in the founding, social conservatives and Tea Partiers have no problem with the idea of American exceptionalism centered on the idea that all persons are born with God-given equal rights. In other words, like Abraham Lincoln and Ronald Reagan, both movements feature a belief in an American exceptionalism that is in fact universal. These are the things that social conservatism and the Tea Party movement seem to share.”[4]

According to his 2003 bio on the website of the now-defunct Foundation for Community and Faith-Centered Enterprise, “A Vietnam veteran and an early supporter of President Reagan and his economic policies, Mr. Bell narrowly lost a race for the U.S. Senate from New Jersey to Bill Bradley in 1978. Since 1980 he has been involved in numerous political campaigns and worked to promote tax reform and to strengthen American families. In 1980 he wrote and produced television commercials for President Reagan’s campaign. In 1986 as part of Citizens for America he worked for passage of the Tax Reform Act. His … organization, Capital City Partners worked with clients to support passage of the 2001 Bush tax cut and the president’s faith-based initiative. Mr. Bell has also served as president of the Manhattan Institute and on the Board of Directors of both the American Conservative Union and the Campaign Finance Institute at George Washington University. He co-founded Of the People, a nationwide parental rights organization. Mr. Bell has had articles published in many venues including theNew York Times, Washington Post andThe Weekly Standard.  His 1992 book, Populism and Elitism: Politics in the Age of Equality, was called “the most important political book” of the year by Fred Barnes of The New Republic.”[5]

Regarding Bell's organization Of The People (OTP) and its proposed Parental Rights Amendment (PRA), People for the American Way opined: "[Greg Erken, OTP executive director] and Jeffrey Bell—Of The People founder and chairman, anti-abortion activist and former strategist for both President Ronald Reagan and former Congressman (and now vice presidential candidate) Jack Kemp—generally stick to their claim that the PRA is a simple affirmation of parental rights and responsibilities unconnected to a right-wing agenda. OTP's second national conference in December 1995, featuring speakers from the Family Research Council, National Center for Home Education and the Free Congress Foundation, belied that assertion. OTP's editorial board includes such notable conservatives as William Kristol, former Vice President Dan Quayle's chief of staff and editor of the Weekly Standard, and Grover Norquist, president of Americans for Tax Reform and a leader of the effort to 'defund the left.'"[6]

 

Please note: IPS Right Web neither represents nor endorses any of the individuals or groups profiled on this site.

Please click the following link to bookmark this page:


If the link doesn't appear don't worry, your browser doesn't support this function.

Try pressing 'ctrl + d' on a PC or 'cmd + d' if your using a Mac.

Close

    Affiliations

    • Project for the New American Century: Signatory to 2002 letter to President George W. Bush on Israel, Arafat and the War on Terrorism; Signatory to 2001 letter to Bush on the War on Terrorism
    • Ethics and Public Policy Center:Visiting Fellow
    • American Enterprise Institute:DeWitt Wallace Fellow in Communications
    • Of The People (parental rights organization): Co-founder and Chairman
    • Campaign Finance Institute: Board of Trustees; Member, Task Force on Financing Presidential Nominations
    • Foundation for Community and Faith Centered Enterprise: Research Associate; also was former lobbyist for the foundation through his Capital City Partners
    • American Conservative Union: Board of Directors
    • Council for National Policy: Former member
    • Bauer for President 2000 Campaign: Senior Consultant
    • Ronald Reagan Presidential Campaign: Wrote and produced TV commercials, 1980
    • Richard Nixon Presidential Campaign: Campaign Aide
    • Citizens For America: Member, emphasis on Tax Reform Act, 1986
    • Manhattan Institute: former President

     

    Business

    • Capital City Partners: Principal
The Right Web Mission

Right Web tracks militarists’ efforts to influence U.S. foreign policy.

Sources

[1] Caral Limbacher, "Jeff Bell: House Races Trending GOP, Senate Unclear," NewsMax.com, October 29, 2002, http://archive.newsmax.com/scripts/showinside.pl?a=2002/10/29/233006.

[2]American Principles Project, “Foundations of the American Principles Project,”http://www.americanprinciplesproject.org/about-app/app-principles.html.

[3]Fred Barnes, “The Principled Opposition,” Weekly Standard, May 28, 2009, http://www.weeklystandard.com/Content/Public/Articles/000/000/016/553kmyoo.asp.

[4]Jeffrey Bell, "A Big Tent on the Right," Weekly Standard, September 20, 2010, http://www.weeklystandard.com/articles/big-tent-right.

[5]FCFE, "Jeffrey Bell Biography,"  http://web.archive.org/web/20031030183037/http://fcfe.org/jeffrey_bell.htm, (Web Archive).

Latest Feature Articles
Whither the Liberal Hawks?

Jim Lobe | January 31, 2012

Tehran's threat to close the Strait of Hormuz, coupled with mounting threats from hawks in Israel and the United States, has brought the possibility of war sharply into view. But a number of influential members of the U.S. foreign policy establishment—including several prominent liberal interventionists who supported the invasion of Iraq—are warning against further escalation.

Rise of the Vulcans Redux

Peter Certo | December 19, 2011

The purported “end of the neocon consensus” has hardly meant an end to hawkishness in the GOP fold. With the Republican candidates virtually all gunning for Iran, backing right-wing Israeli policies toward the Palestinians, and stabling a passel of neoconservative advisers (Ron Paul excepted), voters have plenty of clues about what the foreign policy of a new GOP administration would look like. And while some of the candidates have expressed wariness with neoconservative notions of armed democracy promotion, all the signs indicate that if a Republican wins next year, we will likely be in for a bit if George W. redux.

Turning the Tide on the “Pro-Israel” Debate

Michael Flynn and Peter Certo | December 13, 2011

With key members of the "Israel Lobby" acknowledging the importance of providing a broader space to Israel’s critics, the indelibly beltway Politico recognizing the influence of such critics in a full-length feature, and core Democratic organizations showing an increasing sensitivity to inappropriate uses of the anti-Semite charge, is the United States finally willing to undertake a real debate on what are the best U.S. interests in the Middle East?

The China Divide and the Future of the GOP

Robert Farley | November 08, 2011

The issue of whither U.S. relations with China is an important test case for observing the divide between the free market and neoconservative wings of the Republican Party. Thus far, the GOP presidential candidates have largely failed to articulate a vision of China that comes anywhere close to reflecting the complexity of U.S.-Chinese relations. Among the leading candidates, Mitt Romney has arguably been the most aggressive in his discussion of China policy. Yet, his embrace of a hawkish line towards Beijing would appear to indicate that President Obama’s would-be challengers have not yet found an alternative vocabulary for talking and thinking about one of the critical foreign policy issues of the 2012 election. It seems clear that even though neoconservatives lack grassroots support, they offer what is effectively the only option for an “establishment” GOP candidate, a fact that could have lasting impact both on the viability of any Republican Party foreign policy platform as well as future U.S. decision-making vis-à-vis other hotspots like Iran, Israel, and North Korea.

Right Web | rightweb.irc-online.org


1112 16th St. NW, Suite 600,
Washington, DC 20036
USA
|
|
202-234-9382

Except where otherwise noted, content on this site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License

Right Web is a project of the Institute for Policy Studies; www.ips-dc.org