Institute for Policy Studies  –  www.ips-dc.orgPolitical Research Associates

Right Web

Tracking militarists’ efforts to influence U.S. foreign policy

Robert H. Bork


[![Alternative text]!]
    • Former Supreme Court nominee
    • Hudson Institute: Distinguished Fellow
    • Hoover Institution: Former Visiting Fellow
    • Federalist Society: Co-founder
       

Please note: IPS Right Web neither represents nor endorses any of the individuals or groups profiled on this site.

Robert Bork, the conservative icon and former New Deal liberal who moved to the right while a student at the University of Chicago in the 1950s, was nominated to the Supreme Court by President Ronald Reagan in 1987. The confirmation battle, which he eventually lost, is regarded as one of the bitterest fights ever witnessed on the Senate floor. Bork's connections to a passel of far-right conservatives — including Irving Kristol, Antonin Scalia, and Caspar Weinberger — as well as his strong ties to the Federalist Society (which he helped found in the early 1980s) and the American Enterprise Institute helped get him the nomination. [1]

But his controversial positions also led to bitter protest when his nomination was announced. According to the scholar Philip Burch, "Bork's nomination ... ran into a storm of protest [from such groups as] the Alliance for Justice, the American Civil Liberties Union ... the National Abortion Rights Action League, and the Leadership Conference on Civil Rights, an umbrella organization of 30 groups which had helped secure the passage of many of the civil rights acts of the 1960s. ... As one informed source put it, Bork had opposed virtually every civil rights measure on which he had taken a public stance.” [2]

Bork became mired in controversy early on in his political career. In what came to be known as the “Saturday Night Massacre” during the Watergate crisis in October 1973, Bork — then in the Justice Department — fired Special Prosecutor Archibald Cox, who had issued a subpoena of the tapes of Nixon’s Oval Office conversations, on orders from President Nixon. According to the Washington Post, Nixon “ordered Attorney General Elliot Richardson to fire Cox. Richardson resigned rather than carry out the order, as did Deputy Attorney General William D. Ruckelshaus. Nixon then turned to Bork, the number three official in the Justice Department, who carried out his wishes and fired Cox. Bork would defend his actions as within the scope of presidential authority. Nine months later, the Supreme Court ruled that Nixon had to turn over the tapes.” [3]

At age 76, in 2003, Bork converted to Catholicism. He joined the faculty of the Ava Maria School of Law, funded by Catholic philanthropist Thomas Monaghan, the former Detroit Tigers owner and Domino’s Pizza founder. According to Bork’s bio on the law school site, “Judge Bork has served with distinction as a judge, lawyer, scholar, government official, and law professor. Early in his career, he was an associate and partner with the law firm of Kirkland & Ellis before joining the faculty at Yale Law School. During the 1970s, Judge Bork held the positions of United States Solicitor General and Acting Attorney General. He subsequently served as a United States Court of Appeals judge for the District of Columbia Circuit. Formerly a scholar with the American Enterprise Institute, Judge Bork is currently a Distinguished Senior Fellow at the Hudson Institute and the Tad and Dianne Taube Distinguished Visiting Fellow at the Hoover Institution. The author of numerous books and articles, he has also appeared on many national television programs.” [4]

Bork's books include Coercing Virtue: The Worldwide Rule of Judges(2003), The Tempting of America: The Political Seduction of Law((1997), Slouching Towards Gomorrah: Modern Liberalism and American Decline(1996), reissued with an afterword in 2003, and The Antitrust Paradox: A Policy at War with Itself, revised in 1993. The Intercollegiate Studies Institute published Judge Bork's A Time to Speakin 2008, a collection of his writings, oral arguments, briefs, and opinions spanning his legal career. The ISI website’s marketing flyer for the book describes Bork as “the legal and moral conscience of America, reminding us of our founding principles and their cultural foundation. The scourge of liberal ideologues both before and after Ronald Reagan nominated him for the Supreme Court in 1987, Bork has for fifty years unwaveringly exposed — and explained — the hypocrisy and dereliction of duty endemic among our nation’s elites, the politicization and adversary activism of our courts, and the consequent degradation of American society.” [5]

Bork is the father of Ellen Bork, a neoconservative activist who has worked for two William Kristol-led pressure groups, the Foreign Policy Initiative and the Project for a New American Century.



Please note: IPS Right Web neither represents nor endorses any of the individuals or groups profiled on this site.

  • digg.com
  • delicious.com
  • newsvine.com/
  • stumbleupon.com/
Close

Please click the following link to bookmark this page:


If the link doesn't appear don't worry, your browser doesn't support this function.

Try pressing 'ctrl + d' on a PC or 'cmd + d' if your using a Mac.

Close

Robert H. Bork Résumé

    Affiliations

    • Hudson Institute: Senior Fellow
    • Hoover Institution:Former Visiting Fellow
    • Ava Maria School of Law: Professor
    • American Enterprise Institute: Former Resident scholar, 1988-2003
    • Yale Law School: Professor, 1962-1975, 1977-1981
    • Federalist Society: Co-Chair, Board of Visitors; Co-Founder


    Government

    • U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit: Circuit Judge, 1982-1988
    • U.S. Supreme Court: Nominee, 1987
    • U.S. Department of Justice: Solicitor General, 1973-1977
    • Acting Attorney General of the United States: 1973-1974


    Business

    • Kirkland & Ellis: Former Partner


    Education

    • University of Chicago: B.A.
    • University of Chicago: J.D.
The Right Web Mission

Right Web tracks militarists’ efforts to influence U.S. foreign policy.

Sources

[1] Philip H. Burch, Research in Political Economy: Reagan, Bush, and Right-Wing Politics, Supplement 1 Part B (Greenwich, Conn.: JAI Press), pp.16-19. 1997.

[2] Philip H. Burch, Research in Political Economy: Reagan, Bush, and Right-Wing Politics, Supplement 1 Part B (Greenwich, Conn.: JAI Press), pp.16-19. 1997.

[3] “Watergate Key Players: Robert Bork,” Washington Post, http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/politics/special/watergate/bork.html; Carroll Kilpatrick, “Nixon Forces Firing of Cox: Richardson, Ruckelhaus Quit,” Washington Post, October 21, 1973, http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/national/longterm/watergate/articles/102173-2.htm.

[4] Ava Maria School of Law, “Faculty Profiles: Judge H. Robert Bork,” http://www.avemarialaw.edu/index.cfm?event=faculty.profiles.

[5] ISI Books, “A Time To Speak: Selected Writings and Arguments,” http://www.isi.org/books/bookdetail.aspx?id=04b630a9-3344-4cf6-84df-80e1fa2c1913.

Latest Feature Articles
Will Israeli Dissent Halt the March towards War?

Jim Lobe | May 03, 2012

Tensions have been reaching near fevered pitch over Iran’s nuclear program as Israeli leaders and their supporters in the United States have pressed for military action to prevent Tehran from developing nuclear weapons. However, a number of factors have been working against the hawks, including recent progress at the P5+1 talks and the lack of enthusiasm for another conflict among a war-weary U.S. public. In recent weeks, a new force has emerged that seems to have made the threat of war even less imminent—the unprecedented wave of dissent from current and former top Israeli officials.

The Militarization of the Syrian Uprising

Samer Araabi | April 18, 2012

As pressure mounts to arm rebels in Syria, there is need for a sober assessment of the costs and consequences of the increasing militarization of the conflict there. If history is any guide, a foreign-backed armed rebellion will likely not produce the kind of victory—or engender the kind of support—that the anti-Assad fighters will require to usher in a new Syria. Additionally, there is the very real possibility that many of the rebels—as we’ve seen in Libya—will turn out to be little better than the regime they seek to replace.

Obama to Pro-Israel Lobby Group: ‘Too Much Loose Talk of War’

Mitchell Plitnick | March 05, 2012

Before a skeptical audience of delegates from the American Israel Public Affairs Committee, President Obama affirmed U.S-Israeli ties and challenged detractors to impugn his administration’s record of support for the Jewish state. However, while insisting that that the United States would consider military options in the event of Iran’s developing a nuclear weapon, he also warned Israeli allies of “loose talk” about war, which Obama said only empowers the Iranian regime and decreases prospects for a diplomatic solution.

Whither the Liberal Hawks?

Jim Lobe | January 31, 2012

Tehran's threat to close the Strait of Hormuz, coupled with mounting threats from hawks in Israel and the United States, has brought the possibility of war sharply into view. But a number of influential members of the U.S. foreign policy establishment—including several prominent liberal interventionists who supported the invasion of Iraq—are warning against further escalation.

Right Web | rightweb.irc-online.org


1112 16th St. NW, Suite 600,
Washington, DC 20036
USA
|
|
202-234-9382

Except where otherwise noted, content on this site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License

Right Web is a project of the Institute for Policy Studies; www.ips-dc.org