Institute for Policy Studies  –  www.ips-dc.orgPolitical Research Associates

Right Web

Tracking militarists’ efforts to influence U.S. foreign policy

Ronald Fogleman


    • U.S. Air Force: Retired General
    • Alliant Tech Systems: Board Chairman
    • MITRE Corporation: Board of Trustees

Please note: IPS Right Web neither represents nor endorses any of the individuals or groups profiled on this site.

Ronald Fogleman is a retired U.S. Air Force general and defense industry executive who has served as an adviser on a number of high profile government panels associated with the promotion of hawkish U.S. defense policies.

As of 2010, Fogleman was an executive at several aerospace/defense firms: He was chairman of the board of Alliant Tech Systems and director of AAR Corporation. Additionally, according to Forbes, “General Fogleman has been the non-executive Chairman of ATK's Board of Directors since November 2009. He has been President of B Bar J Cattle and Consulting Company, a consulting firm, since 1997. He retired from the U.S. Air Force in 1997, following a 34-year career. He is also a director of AAR Corp. From 2007 to 2009, he was a director of Alpha Security Group Corporation.”[1]

Fogleman has also served as a member of the board of the MITRE Corporation, a large non-profit defense contractor.[2] He has been joined at MITRE by a host of other elite figures closely associated with militarist advocacy campaigns, including retired Admiral David Jeremiah, a one-time adviser to the neoconservative Jewish Institute for National Security Affairs, and James Schlesinger, a former secretary of the defense and navy who has served.

In 2001, shortly after the election of President George W. Bush, Fogleman was appointed to the Defense Policy Board, a Pentagon advisory board then chaired by Richard Perle. Observers were critical of many of the appointees at that time because of their numerous ties to defense industry interests, arguing that there was a clear conflict of interest (Perle eventually stepped down as chair after his various industry ties were widely discussed in the media).[3] Other members serving with Fogleman included MITRE Corporation colleagues Jeremiah and Schlesinger, as well as Newt Gingrich, Ken Adelman, James Woolsey, Eliot Cohen, Richard Allen, and Martin Anderson. Many of these men had risen to prominence in the Reagan administration after initially joining forces in the late 1970s in the Committee on the Present Danger (CPD), an anticommunist pressure group.[4]

Fogleman also served—along with Jeremiah—on the Donald Rumsfeld-led “Space Commission,” a controversial congressionally mandated commission whose 2001 final report called for developing space weapons.

According to his MITRE bio: “General Fogleman retired from the U.S. Air Force on September 1, 1997, after 34 years of active commissioned service. On his final tour of duty, he served as the 15th chief of staff of the U.S. Air Force and a member of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, and as a military advisor to the Secretary of Defense, the National Security Council, and the President. His staff experience and time as chief of staff saw a heavy emphasis on long-range programming and strategic planning. General Fogleman graduated from the U.S. Air Force Academy in 1963 and subsequently earned a master's degree in military history and political science from Duke University. An active pilot with more than 7,500 total hours, he has an extensive background in fighters, mobility aircraft, and general aviation. He served two tours in Southeast Asia during the Vietnam War, flying 315 combat missions and logging 806 hours of combat fighter time. He has flown mobility aircraft in support of humanitarian and contingency operations on six continents. General Fogleman served as commander in chief of the U.S. Transportation Command; as commander of Air Mobility Command; deputy commander in chief, U.S. Forces, Korea; commander 7th Air Force and Commander Air Component Command of the US/ROK Combined Forces Command; commander 836th Air Division; and commander of the 56th FTW. He was also director, Programs and Evaluation, and chairman, Air Staff Board, at Headquarters U.S. Air Force.”[5]

Please note: IPS Right Web neither represents nor endorses any of the individuals or groups profiled on this site.

Please click the following link to bookmark this page:


If the link doesn't appear don't worry, your browser doesn't support this function.

Try pressing 'ctrl + d' on a PC or 'cmd + d' if your using a Mac.

Close

    Affiliations

    • Council on Foreign Relations: Member
    • Fort Lewis College Foundation: Member
    • Falcon Foundation: Chair
    • Air Force Foundation: Member
    • Airlift Tanker Association: Member

     

    Government

    • Defense Policy Board: Former Member
    • Commission to Assess United States National Security Space Management and Organization (Rumsfeld Space Commission): Former member
    • NASA Mars Program Independent Assessment Team: Member
    • Air Force Research Laboratory: Chair of study on directed energy weapons
    • Secretary of Defense: Former Military Adviser
    • National Security Council: Former Military Adviser
    • Office of the President: Former Military Adviser
    • U.S. Air Force: General (Ret.) and Chief of staff, 1963-1997; various positions

     

    Business

    • The MITRE Corporation: Member of Board of Trustees,1998 -
    • B Bar J Cattle Company: President and Chief Operating Officer
    • Durango Group, LLC.: Founding Principal
    • Projects International: Executive Vice President
    • DERCO Aerospace: Member of Board of Directors
    • Maingate.com: Member of Board of Directors
    • North American Airlines: Member of Board of Directors
    • AAR Corporation: Member of Board of Directors

     

    Education

    • U.S. Air Force Academy: B.S., 1973
    • Duke University: M.A., 1971 in Military History and Political Science
The Right Web Mission

Right Web tracks militarists’ efforts to influence U.S. foreign policy.

Sources

[1]Forbes.com, “Ronald Fogleman,” http://people.forbes.com/profile/ronald-r-fogleman/410.

[2]MITRE, "Ronald Fogleman," http://www.mitre.org/about/bot/fogleman.html.

[3]Center for Public Integrity,  "Advisors of Influence," 2003.

[4]Center for Public Integrity,  "Advisors of Influence," 2003.

[5]MITRE, "Ronald Fogleman," http://www.mitre.org/about/bot/fogleman.html.

Latest Feature Articles
Whither the Liberal Hawks?

Jim Lobe | January 31, 2012

Tehran's threat to close the Strait of Hormuz, coupled with mounting threats from hawks in Israel and the United States, has brought the possibility of war sharply into view. But a number of influential members of the U.S. foreign policy establishment—including several prominent liberal interventionists who supported the invasion of Iraq—are warning against further escalation.

Rise of the Vulcans Redux

Peter Certo | December 19, 2011

The purported “end of the neocon consensus” has hardly meant an end to hawkishness in the GOP fold. With the Republican candidates virtually all gunning for Iran, backing right-wing Israeli policies toward the Palestinians, and stabling a passel of neoconservative advisers (Ron Paul excepted), voters have plenty of clues about what the foreign policy of a new GOP administration would look like. And while some of the candidates have expressed wariness with neoconservative notions of armed democracy promotion, all the signs indicate that if a Republican wins next year, we will likely be in for a bit if George W. redux.

Turning the Tide on the “Pro-Israel” Debate

Michael Flynn and Peter Certo | December 13, 2011

With key members of the "Israel Lobby" acknowledging the importance of providing a broader space to Israel’s critics, the indelibly beltway Politico recognizing the influence of such critics in a full-length feature, and core Democratic organizations showing an increasing sensitivity to inappropriate uses of the anti-Semite charge, is the United States finally willing to undertake a real debate on what are the best U.S. interests in the Middle East?

The China Divide and the Future of the GOP

Robert Farley | November 08, 2011

The issue of whither U.S. relations with China is an important test case for observing the divide between the free market and neoconservative wings of the Republican Party. Thus far, the GOP presidential candidates have largely failed to articulate a vision of China that comes anywhere close to reflecting the complexity of U.S.-Chinese relations. Among the leading candidates, Mitt Romney has arguably been the most aggressive in his discussion of China policy. Yet, his embrace of a hawkish line towards Beijing would appear to indicate that President Obama’s would-be challengers have not yet found an alternative vocabulary for talking and thinking about one of the critical foreign policy issues of the 2012 election. It seems clear that even though neoconservatives lack grassroots support, they offer what is effectively the only option for an “establishment” GOP candidate, a fact that could have lasting impact both on the viability of any Republican Party foreign policy platform as well as future U.S. decision-making vis-à-vis other hotspots like Iran, Israel, and North Korea.

Right Web | rightweb.irc-online.org


1112 16th St. NW, Suite 600,
Washington, DC 20036
USA
|
|
202-234-9382

Except where otherwise noted, content on this site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License

Right Web is a project of the Institute for Policy Studies; www.ips-dc.org