Institute for Policy Studies  –  www.ips-dc.orgPolitical Research Associates

Right Web

Tracking militarists’ efforts to influence U.S. foreign policy

Jeffrey Gedmin


  • Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty: Director
  • American Enterprise Institute: Former Scholar
  • Project for the New American Century: Founding Signatory

Please note: IPS Right Web neither represents nor endorses any of the individuals or groups profiled on this site.

Jeffrey Gedmin, a longtime supporter of neoconservative advocacy efforts aimed at pushing interventionist overseas foreign and military policies, was named the director of Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty (RFE) in early 2007. The radio station, which is funded by the U.S. government, gained fame during the Cold War for its anti-communist, pro-democracy broadcasts that were beamed into the Soviet Union. More recently, while under the watch of former director Thomas Dine, a past head of the pro-Israel lobby the American Israel Pubic Affairs Committee, RFE gained attention for its antiterror programming, which has been broadcast under the title Radio Farda into Iran and other Mideast countries targeted by the George W. Bush administration as part of its "war on terror."

In announcing Gedmin's hiring in early February 2007, Kenneth Tomlinson, an RFE board member, argued that Gedmin had a "blend of experience as a distinguished scholar, writer, administrator, and a career devoted to international work" ("Jeffrey Gedmin Named President of Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty," RFE Press release, February 2, 2007). (Tomlinson gained notoriety in 2004, when as head of the U.S. Corporation for Public Broadcasting he tried to eliminate what he saw as the liberal bias in public television. He was eventually forced to resign, reports the Arizona Republic, "after an inspector general's report found that he violated federal rules and ethics standards" while trying to purge PBS.)

Despite Tomlinson's vote of support for Gedmin, many observers and RFE staff members expressed concern that Gedmin's ideological stances in support of Bush administration policies could affect the station's general tenor. According to the Prague Post (RFE is based in Prague), in recent years the station has begun cutting its broadcasts to European countries while increasing the amount of its programming for Islamic countries. Of the 28 countries that receive RFE broadcasts, according to the Prague Post, 18 are mostly Muslim countries.

Reported the Prague Post (February 21, 2007): " Along with the development of programming for Muslim listeners, some RFE/RL staff members have voiced concern that a new, conservative president could alter the station's tone ... He currently directs the Aspen Institute in Berlin, a nonprofit organization with a mission 'to foster enlightened leadership and open-minded dialogue.' Before joining the institute in 2001, Gedmin was executive director of the right-leaning New Atlantic Initiative of the American Enterprise Institute. He is also a founder of Project for the New American Century, a major proponent of the 2003 U.S.-led invasion of Iraq. Gedmin's editorial pieces in various newspapers leave little room for doubt as to his political leanings. In a Nov. 20, 2006, article in the neoconservative magazine the Weekly Standard, Gedmin asks, 'Will George W. Bush ever get his due?' and writes that the president 'has forever changed the conversation about democracy and the Middle East to the benefit of humankind.'"

Asked by the Prague Post (April 11, 2007) about the purpose of RFE broadcasts into Iran, Gedmin, who no longer directs the Aspen Institute but still publishes on its website, responded: "Imagine Iran was a democracy ... The fact that France has the bomb doesn't keep anybody up late at night ... They're not going to use it. They're a democracy ... [So] why doesn't the West have a more cogent strategy to support the democracy movement in Iran ... as a way of containing some of these issues? We're a small piece of that." Asked whether his connections to Bush administration figures could complicate his relations with RFE, Gedmin said: "I don't see any conflicts ... I don't care if someone supports Bush or Clinton or the deputy dogcatcher. I want serious people who believe in ideas and open, constructive debate."

Gedmin told Germany's Tagesspiegel: "I haven't the slightest doubt that such work is urgently needed" (Der Tagesspiegel, March 13, 2007.)

Gedmin's support of neoconservative-led advocacy efforts began long before the 9/11 terror attacks. In February 1998, for example, Gedmin joined an impressive list of hawkish foreign policy elites (including Richard Perle, Richard Allen, Stephen Bryen, Frank Gaffney, Douglas Feith, Robert Kagan, Paul Wolfowitz, and David Wurmser) in signing his name to an "open letter" to President Bill Clinton produced by the Committee for Peace and Security in the Gulf that advocated overthrowing Saddam Hussein. The letter, part of a broad neocon campaign that championed a new post-Cold War U.S. foreign policy aimed at overturning rogue regimes and aggressively pushing democracy, argued that "containment" of Iraq was not viable because of its purported weapons of mass destruction programs. "Only a determined program to change the regime in Baghdad will bring the Iraqi crisis to a satisfactory conclusion," the letter said.

In 1997, Gedmin joined a similar coterie of hardliners and elites in forming the Project for the New American Century (PNAC). PNAC's founding statement of principles, published in June 1997, called for a "Reaganite policy of military strength and moral clarity" that would ensure "American global leadership." It added: "We need to accept responsibility for America's unique role in preserving and extending an international order friendly to our security, our prosperity, and our principles."

Gedmin is a sometime-contributor to the Financial Times as well as to the neoconservative-run Weekly Standard.

Please note: IPS Right Web neither represents nor endorses any of the individuals or groups profiled on this site.

Please click the following link to bookmark this page:


If the link doesn't appear don't worry, your browser doesn't support this function.

Try pressing 'ctrl + d' on a PC or 'cmd + d' if your using a Mac.

Close
    Affiliations

  • Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty: Director (2007-)
  • Aspen Institute: Former Director
  • Georgetown University: Former Adjunct Lecturer
  • Council for a Community of Democracies: Former Member of the Board of Directors
  • Project for the New American Century: Founding Signatory
  • American Enterprise Institute: Former Resident Scholar and Executive Director of AEI's New Atlantic Initiative


  • Education

  • American University: B.A. and M.A. in German
  • Georgetown University: Ph.D.


The Right Web Mission

Right Web tracks militarists’ efforts to influence U.S. foreign policy.

Sources
"Jeffrey Gedmin Named President of Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty," RFE Press Release, February 2, 2007.

Dennis Wagner, "Producer: PBS Dropped 'Islam vs. Islamists' on Political Grounds," Arizona Republic, April 10, 2007.

Kimberly Ashton, "RFE/RL Changes Its Tune," Prague Post, February 21, 2007.

Hilda Hoy, "RFE/RL Head Is Willing to Fight," Prague Post, April 11, 2007.

Committee for Peace and Security in the Gulf, "Open Letter to the President," February 19, 1998.

Interview by Caroline Fetscher with Jeffrey Gedmin, "Irgendwas Machen Wir Richtig," Der Tagesspiegel, March 13, 2007.
Latest Feature Articles
Whither the Liberal Hawks?

Jim Lobe | January 31, 2012

Tehran's threat to close the Strait of Hormuz, coupled with mounting threats from hawks in Israel and the United States, has brought the possibility of war sharply into view. But a number of influential members of the U.S. foreign policy establishment—including several prominent liberal interventionists who supported the invasion of Iraq—are warning against further escalation.

Rise of the Vulcans Redux

Peter Certo | December 19, 2011

The purported “end of the neocon consensus” has hardly meant an end to hawkishness in the GOP fold. With the Republican candidates virtually all gunning for Iran, backing right-wing Israeli policies toward the Palestinians, and stabling a passel of neoconservative advisers (Ron Paul excepted), voters have plenty of clues about what the foreign policy of a new GOP administration would look like. And while some of the candidates have expressed wariness with neoconservative notions of armed democracy promotion, all the signs indicate that if a Republican wins next year, we will likely be in for a bit if George W. redux.

Turning the Tide on the “Pro-Israel” Debate

Michael Flynn and Peter Certo | December 13, 2011

With key members of the "Israel Lobby" acknowledging the importance of providing a broader space to Israel’s critics, the indelibly beltway Politico recognizing the influence of such critics in a full-length feature, and core Democratic organizations showing an increasing sensitivity to inappropriate uses of the anti-Semite charge, is the United States finally willing to undertake a real debate on what are the best U.S. interests in the Middle East?

The China Divide and the Future of the GOP

Robert Farley | November 08, 2011

The issue of whither U.S. relations with China is an important test case for observing the divide between the free market and neoconservative wings of the Republican Party. Thus far, the GOP presidential candidates have largely failed to articulate a vision of China that comes anywhere close to reflecting the complexity of U.S.-Chinese relations. Among the leading candidates, Mitt Romney has arguably been the most aggressive in his discussion of China policy. Yet, his embrace of a hawkish line towards Beijing would appear to indicate that President Obama’s would-be challengers have not yet found an alternative vocabulary for talking and thinking about one of the critical foreign policy issues of the 2012 election. It seems clear that even though neoconservatives lack grassroots support, they offer what is effectively the only option for an “establishment” GOP candidate, a fact that could have lasting impact both on the viability of any Republican Party foreign policy platform as well as future U.S. decision-making vis-à-vis other hotspots like Iran, Israel, and North Korea.

Right Web | rightweb.irc-online.org


1112 16th St. NW, Suite 600,
Washington, DC 20036
USA
|
|
202-234-9382

Except where otherwise noted, content on this site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License

Right Web is a project of the Institute for Policy Studies; www.ips-dc.org