Institute for Policy Studies  –  www.ips-dc.orgPolitical Research Associates

Right Web

Tracking militarists’ efforts to influence U.S. foreign policy

Thomas Moorman Jr.


    • Booz Allen Hamilton: Partner
    • Integral Systems: Board Member
    • Rumsfeld Space Commission: Commissioner
    • U.S. Air Force: Former Vice Chief Of Staff
    • Center for Security Policy: Signatory

Please note: IPS Right Web neither represents nor endorses any of the individuals or groups profiled on this site.

Retired General Thomas S. Moorman, Jr., the former vice chief of staff of the Air Force and commander of Air Force Space Command, has represented defense industry interests at the same time as he served on government boards promoting militarization. A board member of government contractor Integral Systems and partner at Booz Allen Hamilton, a subcontractor on Pentagon missile defense projects[1], Moorman has also supported an advocacy campaign of the hawkish “pro-Israel” group the Center for Security Policy and promoted the weaponization of space as part of a commission headed by Donald Rumsfeld.

According to a 2010 Integral Systems press release about his board appointment, Moorman’s “wide-ranging industry and military experience spans more than four decades. He currently is a Senior Executive Advisor to Booz Allen Hamilton. Before retiring in 2008, he led Booz Allen's Air Force and NASA business as a Partner and Vice President. Prior to joining Booz Allen, General Moorman served as Vice Chief of Staff, United States Air Force, where he was responsible for the day-to-day activities of the Air Staff. He also chaired the Air Force Council and represented the Air Force on interagency organizations, such as the Joint Requirements Oversight Council (JROC) and DOD-wide efforts, such as the Quadrennial Defense Review (QDR).”[2]

His biography on the Forbes website adds that he was “involved in the fielding of virtually all of the space systems currently in the military inventory. Earlier in his career, General Moorman was deeply involved in planning and organizing the establishment of Air Force Space Command (AFSPC). Later, as Commander and Vice Commander of AFSPC from 1990-1994, General Moorman was responsible for operating military space systems, ground-based radar and missile warning satellites, the United States space launch centers at Patrick Air Force Base, Florida and Vandenberg Air Force Base, California, the worldwide network of space surveillance radars as well as maintaining the Intercontinental Ballistic Missile (ICBM) force. As the Commander, General Moorman was responsible for providing Air Force space support to coalition forces in Operation Desert Storm.”[3]

Moorman represented the Air Force in the Strategic Defense Initiative program and was authorized to accept SDI program execution responsibilities on behalf of the Air Force.[4]

Moorman was one of 44 retired high-level military officials who signed the Center for Security Policy’s “Open Letter to President Clinton” in January 1998 calling on the president to "deny our enemies the use of space" and thus heed the recommendations of the National Defense Panel to assure “the means necessary to provide space dominance and in [reject] budgetary and arms control arrangements that would jeopardize that required capability.[5]

In 1999, he was asked to serve on the congressionally authorized Commission to Assess United States National Security Space Management and Organization, also known as the Rumsfeld Space Commission, along with Ronald Fogelman and a host of other well known security hawks. Donald Rumsfeld chaired the commission, which concluded in its January 2001 report that it is "possible to project power through and from space in response to events anywhere in the world. ... Having this capability would give the United States a much stronger deterrent and, in a conflict, an extraordinary military advantage." According to Rumsfeld, the United States could not allow rival countries to gain asymmetrical military advantage, so it needed to expand operations in space and use force if necessary.[6]

Please note: IPS Right Web neither represents nor endorses any of the individuals or groups profiled on this site.

Please click the following link to bookmark this page:


If the link doesn't appear don't worry, your browser doesn't support this function.

Try pressing 'ctrl + d' on a PC or 'cmd + d' if your using a Mac.

Close

    Affiliations

    • Center for Security Policy:Signatory, Letter to President Clinton calling for "space dominance," 1998
    • Council on Foreign Relations:Member
    • U.S. Space Foundation:Director Emeritus

     

    Government

    • Defense Science Board:Member of task force on acquisition of space capabilities, 2003
    • Commission to Assess United States National Security Space Management and Organization (Rumsfeld Space Commission):Commissioner, 1999
    • U.S. Air Force:Vice Chief of Staff, 1994-1997; Commander of the Air Force Space Command, 1990-1994; Director of Space and Strategic Defense Initiative programs, 1987-1990; Special Assistant for Strategic Defense Initiative, 1987-1990; various assignments, 1962-1987
    • U.S. Department of Defense Policy Board:Former Advisory Committee Member

     

    Business

    • Integral Systems: Board Member
    • Booz Allen Hamilton:Senior Executive Advisor, Former Vice President
    • Aerospace Corporation: Former Member of the Board of Trustees
    • National Space Club: Former Board Member
    • Smiths Industries: Former Outside Director

     

    Education

    • Dartmouth College: B.A., 1962 in History
    • Western New England College: M.B.A., 1972
    • Auburn University: M.A., 1975 in Political Science
The Right Web Mission

Right Web tracks militarists’ efforts to influence U.S. foreign policy.

Sources

[1]World Policy Institute, “Tangled Web 2005: A Profile of the Missile Defense and Space Weapons Lobbies,”http://www.worldpolicy.org/projects/arms/reports/tangledweb.html.

[2]Integral Systems Press Release, “Integral Systems Announces Appointment of General Thomas S. Moorman (USAF Retired) to Its Board of Directors,” Integral Systems, April 30, 2010, http://baltimore.citybizlist.com/1/2010/4/30/Integral-Systems-Announces-Appointment-of-General-Thomas-S.-Moorman-%28USAF-Retired%29-to-Its-Board-of-Directors.aspx.

[3]Forbes, “Thomas S. Moorman: Director, Integral Systems, Inc.,” http://people.forbes.com/profile/thomas-s-moorman/143296.

[4]United States Air Force, “Biography General Thomas S. Moorman Jr.,” http://www.af.mil/information/bios/bio_print.asp?bioID=6528&page=1.

[5]Center For Security Policy, “An Open Letter To President Clinton,” January 15, 1998, http://www.centerforsecuritypolicy.org/p1400.xml.

[6]“U.S. Astropolitics,” April 25, 2007, http://www.lwis.net/journal/2007/04/25/us-astropolitics/.

Latest Feature Articles
Whither the Liberal Hawks?

Jim Lobe | January 31, 2012

Tehran's threat to close the Strait of Hormuz, coupled with mounting threats from hawks in Israel and the United States, has brought the possibility of war sharply into view. But a number of influential members of the U.S. foreign policy establishment—including several prominent liberal interventionists who supported the invasion of Iraq—are warning against further escalation.

Rise of the Vulcans Redux

Peter Certo | December 19, 2011

The purported “end of the neocon consensus” has hardly meant an end to hawkishness in the GOP fold. With the Republican candidates virtually all gunning for Iran, backing right-wing Israeli policies toward the Palestinians, and stabling a passel of neoconservative advisers (Ron Paul excepted), voters have plenty of clues about what the foreign policy of a new GOP administration would look like. And while some of the candidates have expressed wariness with neoconservative notions of armed democracy promotion, all the signs indicate that if a Republican wins next year, we will likely be in for a bit if George W. redux.

Turning the Tide on the “Pro-Israel” Debate

Michael Flynn and Peter Certo | December 13, 2011

With key members of the "Israel Lobby" acknowledging the importance of providing a broader space to Israel’s critics, the indelibly beltway Politico recognizing the influence of such critics in a full-length feature, and core Democratic organizations showing an increasing sensitivity to inappropriate uses of the anti-Semite charge, is the United States finally willing to undertake a real debate on what are the best U.S. interests in the Middle East?

The China Divide and the Future of the GOP

Robert Farley | November 08, 2011

The issue of whither U.S. relations with China is an important test case for observing the divide between the free market and neoconservative wings of the Republican Party. Thus far, the GOP presidential candidates have largely failed to articulate a vision of China that comes anywhere close to reflecting the complexity of U.S.-Chinese relations. Among the leading candidates, Mitt Romney has arguably been the most aggressive in his discussion of China policy. Yet, his embrace of a hawkish line towards Beijing would appear to indicate that President Obama’s would-be challengers have not yet found an alternative vocabulary for talking and thinking about one of the critical foreign policy issues of the 2012 election. It seems clear that even though neoconservatives lack grassroots support, they offer what is effectively the only option for an “establishment” GOP candidate, a fact that could have lasting impact both on the viability of any Republican Party foreign policy platform as well as future U.S. decision-making vis-à-vis other hotspots like Iran, Israel, and North Korea.

Right Web | rightweb.irc-online.org


1112 16th St. NW, Suite 600,
Washington, DC 20036
USA
|
|
202-234-9382

Except where otherwise noted, content on this site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License

Right Web is a project of the Institute for Policy Studies; www.ips-dc.org