Institute for Policy Studies  –  www.ips-dc.orgPolitical Research Associates

Right Web

Tracking militarists’ efforts to influence U.S. foreign policy

Randy Scheunemann


    • Orion Strategies LCC: President

Please note: IPS Right Web neither represents nor endorses any of the individuals or groups profiled on this site.

Randy Scheunemann, founder and president of the public relations firm Orion Strategies, is a well-connected lobbyist and political insider who has advised a number of conservative political figures, supported the work of various neoconservative-led advocacy groups, and lobbied on behalf of defense industry clients and foreign governments.

Despite his close association with right-wing factions, Scheunemann has also advised the liberal Open Society, founded by billionaire financier George Soros. In November 2010, Salon.com’s Justin Elliott reported that federal disclosure forms revealed Scheunemann’s lobbying firm, Orion Strategies, had “since 2003 been paid over $150,000 by [Open Society Policy Center] for lobbying work. … The lobbying, which has continued to the present, centers on legislation involving sanctions and democracy promotion in Burma.”[1]

During the 2008 presidential election, Scheunemann served as an advisor to Sen. John McCain’s (R-AZ) campaign. Among his roles was to advise VP candidate Sarah Palin on foreign policy. At Palin’s suggestion, Tea Party favorite and failed Republican Senate candidate Christine O’Donnell enlisted Scheunemann and Weekly Standard online editor Michael Goldfarb to help her with debate prep during the 2010 midterm elections.[2]

Along with neoconservative figures like Robert Kagan and William Kristol, Scheunemann served as a director of the now-defunct Project for the New American Century (PNAC), a letterhead group that played an important role in building support for the Iraq War and an expansive “war on terror.”[3] He also headed the Committee for the Liberation of Iraq (CLI), a post-9/11 advocacy outfit that pushed for war in Iraq. Like PNAC, CLI played a key role forging a coalition of Beltway figures who supported a Middle East agenda that had at its core toppling Saddam Hussein.[4] CLI members included McCain and Sen. Joe Lieberman (I-CT).[5]

According to the Lobbying Registration office of the U.S. House of Representatives and the watchdog group OpenSecrets.org, Scheunemann's former lobbying firm of Scheunemann & Associates represented the National Rifle Association for several years.[6] In 2005, the firm also represented the Caspian Alliance, a consortium of oil- and gas-producing nations from the Caspian region. Scheunemann also led the lobbying firms Orion Strategies (which he owns) and the Mercury Group. The Mercury Group, for which Scheunemann served as president, has lobbied on behalf clients that include Swiftships Shipbuilders, Barrett Firearms Manufacturing, BP America, Air Force Memorial Foundation, Lockheed Martin, National Shooting Sports Foundation, and Sporting Arms and Ammunitions Manufacturers.[7]

As McCain Adviser

In May 2008, the New York Times reported that Scheunemann had been working as a lobbyist for foreign governments as a “registered foreign agent” while he was advising the McCain campaign.[8] “Over the past several years, Mr. Scheunemann met several times with Mr. McCain to discuss his clients’ interests. The New York Times reported he introduced the senator to a representative of Taiwan as it lobbied for free trade and to the foreign ministers of Albania, Croatia, and Macedonia as they tried to win admission to NATO. He also accompanied McCain to Latvia in 2001 and Georgia in 2006.”[9] In March 2008, Scheunemann ended his registrations with several countries, according to the Times. The McCain campaign policy prevented campaign workers from being paid for lobbying work. Nor were they “allowed to participate in any campaign conversations about the issues for which they lobby, which would seem to pose a conflict for someone like Mr. Scheunemann. His work as a foreign agent could overlap on any number of issues with his foreign policy advice.”[10]

Scheunemann was sharply critical of other presidential contenders during the 2008 campaign, sometimes charging them with having a “September 10 mindset” that was not suited for fighting terrorism.[11] While commenting on former Republican presidential nominee Mitt Romney's support for "timetables and milestones" for the Iraqi government, Scheunemann asserted that McCain "does not believe in timetables or deadlines, secret or otherwise. He has made it clear that setting a timetable or deadline is nothing more than setting a date certain for surrender."[12] In mid-2007, Scheunemann called the idea of withdrawing troops from Iraq “ludicrous. Because the idea that we will be able to better prevent sectarian violence and fight al-Qaida better from Kuwait than how we are doing it now is laughable."[13]

Scheunemann also advised McCain during his failed 2000 presidential bid, which was a period when the candidate’s views on foreign affairs evolved dramatically.[14] John Judis wrote that McCain began "seeking to differentiate his views from those of other Republican presidential aspirants and from the growing isolationism of House Republicans ... [placing] his new interventionist instincts within a larger ideological framework. That ideological framework was neoconservatism. McCain began reading theWeekly Standard and conferring with its editors, particularly Bill Kristol." Shortly after his staff consulted with Kristol, McCain hired a bevy of neoconservative-aligned operatives, including Scheunemann, Marshall Wittmann, and Daniel McKivergan.[15]

The impact of this group of advisors on the senator's thinking was apparent in early 1999, Judis reported, when McCain spoke at Kansas State University using a stump speech Scheunemann helped draft. In it, McCain echoed the neoconservative idea of "national greatness conservatism," arguing: "The United States is the indispensable nation because we have proven to be the greatest force for good in human history.... [W]e have every intention of continuing to use our primacy in world affairs for humanity's benefit." Judis reported, "The centerpiece of the speech was a strategy that McCain called 'rogue-state rollback,'" a term Scheunemann claimed to have created based on rhetoric used by critics of 1950s Cold War containment strategy.[16]

Capitol Hill Experience

Scheunemann’s Capitol Hill experience dates back to the mid-1980s, when he began working for a number of congressional committees. According to his biography on the PNAC website, between 1986 and 1993 Scheunemann "served on the staffs of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, the House Foreign Affairs Committee, and the House Republican Policy Committee."[17] He then became a senior advisor to Republican presidential candidate Sen. Bob Dole (R-KS) in 1996, served on the 1996 Republican Platform Committee, and between 1993 and 1999 was national security advisor for Dole and Sen. Trent Lott (R-MS).[18] In 1997, during the time he worked as a congressional aide for Lott, Scheunemann reportedly forgot to remove a shotgun from his car after a duck-hunting trip; when he drove up to the U.S. Capitol to report for work, he was arrested for possession of an unregistered firearm.[19]

Scheunemann's PNAC bio states that while working on the Hill, he "was involved in Senate deliberations concerning the use of American military power in Somalia, the Korean Peninsula, Iraq, Haiti, and Bosnia. He also served as coordinator for Senate Republican policy on UN reform, congressional-executive war powers, NATO enlargement, global climate change, economic sanctions, ballistic missile defense, and technology transfers to China."[20]

Scheunemann helped draft the 1998 Iraq Liberation Act, which made the toppling of Saddam Hussein an official U.S. policy goal and authorized $98 million for the Iraqi National Congress, a loose grouping of Iraqi dissidents led by Ahmad Chalabi that has been widely blamed for channeling false intelligence about Iraq.[21] Scheunemann also served briefly as an advisor to Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld early in the George W. Bush administration on Iraq policy.[22]

Foreign Government Clients

Much of Scheunemann’s work, in both the public and private spheres, has been oriented toward Europe, promoting democratic programs and expanding NATO to former Soviet-bloc countries. He is a board member of the International Republican Institute (IRI), a key institutional vehicle through which the National Endowment for Democracy carries out its mission, and worked closely on NATO expansion issues with Bruce Jackson, a fellow former PNAC director, as a board member of Jackson's U.S. Committee on NATO. Scheunemann has lobbied or consulted for Georgia, Latvia, Macedonia, and Romania.[23]

According to the Financial Times, while serving as "an American adviser to the Georgian government" in late 2006, Scheunemann was critical of the Bush administration during its consultations with Russia in the U.N. Security Council regarding security issues in Georgia. He accused then Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice of "appeasement" for agreeing to Russia’s demand for a U.N. resolution regarding the Russia-supported republic of Abkhazia, which broke away from Georgia, in exchange for Russia's support of sanctions on North Korea in the wake of that country's nuclear test. Said Scheunemann: "What Rice approved was a weak, ambiguous resolution on North Korea. They sold out the Georgians. That was the trade."[24]

Please note: IPS Right Web neither represents nor endorses any of the individuals or groups profiled on this site.

Please click the following link to bookmark this page:


If the link doesn't appear don't worry, your browser doesn't support this function.

Try pressing 'ctrl + d' on a PC or 'cmd + d' if your using a Mac.

Close

    Affiliations

    • McCain 2008 Presidential Campaign: Senior Foreign Policy and National Security Advisor
    • International Republican Institute: Member, Board of Directors
    • Project for the New American Century: Former Member, Board of Directors
    • Project on Transitional Democracies: Former Treasurer
    • U.S. Committee on NATO: Former Member, Board of Directors
    • Committee for the Liberation of Iraq: Former President and Executive Director
    • McCain 2000 Presidential Campaign: Senior Defense and Foreign Policy Advisor
    • Republican Platform Committee: Member, 1996
    • Bob Dole Presidential Campaign: Senior Advisor, 1996

     

    Government

    • Office of the Secretary of Defense: Consultant on Iraq Policy, 2001
    • Staff for Senate Majority Leaders Trent Lott and Bob Dole: National Security Adviser, 1993-1998
    • Congressional Committee Staffs: Senate Foreign Relations Committee, House Foreign Affairs Committee, House Republican Policy Committee, 1986-1993

     

    Private Sector

    • Orion Strategies LLC: President
    • Scheunemann & Associates: Lobbyist for National Rifle Association, 1999-2002; Consultants to McCain 2008 Campaign
    • Mercury Group: Former President, 1999-2000
Randy Scheunemann News Feed

Right Web is not responsible for the content of external internet sites.

The Right Web Mission

Right Web tracks militarists’ efforts to influence U.S. foreign policy.

Sources

[1]Justin Elliot, “Top Palin Aide is on Soros' Payroll,” Salon.com, November 12, 2010, http://www.salon.com/news/politics/war_room/2010/11/12/orion_soros_palin.

[2]Scott McConnell, “Standard Operating Procedures: How the Neocons Are Co-opting the Tea Party,” Right Web, November 9, 2010, http://rightweb.irc-online.org/articles/display/standard_operating_procedures_how_the_neocons_are_co_opting_the_tea_party.

[3]Jim Lobe and Michael Flynn, “The Rise and Decline of the Neoconservatives,” Right Web, November 17, 2006, http://rightweb.irc-online.org/rw/3713.html.

[4]Peter Slevin, “Randy Scheunemann: McCain Adviser Campaigned for War,” Washington Post, The Trail Blog, June 17, 2008, http://voices.washingtonpost.com/44/2008/06/randy-scheunemann-mccain-advis.html.

[5]Jim Lobe, "Committee for the Liberation of Iraq Sets Up Shop," FPIF Policy Report, November 2002.

[6]OpenSecrets.org, Center for Responsive Politics, “Lobbying: Scheuemann & Assoc,” http://www.opensecrets.org/lobby/firmsum.php?lname=Scheunemann+%26+Assoc&year=2002.

[7]OpenSecrets.org, Center for Responsive Politics, “Lobbying: Mercury Group,” http://www.opensecrets.org/lobby/firmsum.php?year=1999&lname=Mercury+Group; Lobbying Disclosure Office of the U.S. House of Representatives, http://lobbyingdisclosure.house.gov/.

[8]Barry Meier and Kate Zernike, “McCain Finds a Thorny Path in Ethics Effort,” New York Times, May 20, 2008, http://www.nytimes.com/2008/05/20/us/politics/20mccain.html.

[9]Barry Meier and Kate Zernike, “McCain Finds a Thorny Path in Ethics Effort,” New York Times, May 20, 2008, http://www.nytimes.com/2008/05/20/us/politics/20mccain.html.

[10]Barry Meier and Kate Zernike, “McCain Finds a Thorny Path in Ethics Effort,” New York Times, May 20, 2008, http://www.nytimes.com/2008/05/20/us/politics/20mccain.html.

[11]Michael Cooper, “Campaigns in a Skirmish over Law and Terrorism,” New York Times, June 18, 2008, http://www.nytimes.com/2008/06/18/us/politics/18mccain.html.

[12]Jason Horowitz, "The Iraq-eteers," New York Observer, April 15, 2007, http://www.observer.com/node/31994.

[13]Quoted in Jason Horowitz, "McCain's Bulldog," New York Observer blog, April 11, 2007, http://www.observer.com/node/32000.

[14]John Judis, "Neo-McCain," New Republic, October 16, 2006, http://www.tnr.com/article/politics/neo-mccain.

[15]John Judis, "Neo-McCain," New Republic, October 16, 2006, http://www.tnr.com/article/politics/neo-mccain.

[16]John Judis, "Neo-McCain," New Republic, October 16, 2006. http://www.tnr.com/article/politics/neo-mccain.

[17]Project for the New American Century, “Biography of Randy Scheunemann,” http://web.archive.org/web/20070810114215/http://www.newamericancentury.org/randyscheunemannbio.htm.

[18]Project for the New American Century, “Biography of Randy Scheunemann,” http://web.archive.org/web/20070810114215/http://www.newamericancentury.org/randyscheunemannbio.htm.

[19]John McCaslin, “Sitting Duck,” Washington Times, February 5, 1997.

[20]Project for the New American Century, “Biography of Randy Scheunemann,” http://web.archive.org/web/20070810114215/http://www.newamericancentury.org/randyscheunemannbio.htm.

[21]Jim Lobe, "New Champions of the War Cause," Asia Times, November 6, 2002, http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Middle_East/DK06Ak02.html.

[22]“McCain Foreign Policy Aide Outlines Iraq Position,” All Things Considered, National Public Radio, June 26, 2008, http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=91940482; Kurt Nimmo, “Committee for the Liberation of Iraq: PR Spinning the Bush Doctrine,” CounterPunch, November 19, 2002, http://home.comcast.net/~bushblog/Imported_documents/McCaffrey1.htm.

[23]John Judis, "Minister Without Portfolio," American Prospect, May 1, 2003, http://www.prospect.org/cs/articles?article=minister_without_portfolio; Mark Benjamin, “John McCain’s Tough Stance Towards Russia,” Salon.com, June 9, 2008, http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2008/06/09/mccain.

[24]Guy Dinmore, "Georgia Feels at the Mercy of Big Powers' Maneuvers," Financial Times, October 21, 2006.

Latest Feature Articles
Whither the Liberal Hawks?

Jim Lobe | January 31, 2012

Tehran's threat to close the Strait of Hormuz, coupled with mounting threats from hawks in Israel and the United States, has brought the possibility of war sharply into view. But a number of influential members of the U.S. foreign policy establishment—including several prominent liberal interventionists who supported the invasion of Iraq—are warning against further escalation.

Rise of the Vulcans Redux

Peter Certo | December 19, 2011

The purported “end of the neocon consensus” has hardly meant an end to hawkishness in the GOP fold. With the Republican candidates virtually all gunning for Iran, backing right-wing Israeli policies toward the Palestinians, and stabling a passel of neoconservative advisers (Ron Paul excepted), voters have plenty of clues about what the foreign policy of a new GOP administration would look like. And while some of the candidates have expressed wariness with neoconservative notions of armed democracy promotion, all the signs indicate that if a Republican wins next year, we will likely be in for a bit if George W. redux.

Turning the Tide on the “Pro-Israel” Debate

Michael Flynn and Peter Certo | December 13, 2011

With key members of the "Israel Lobby" acknowledging the importance of providing a broader space to Israel’s critics, the indelibly beltway Politico recognizing the influence of such critics in a full-length feature, and core Democratic organizations showing an increasing sensitivity to inappropriate uses of the anti-Semite charge, is the United States finally willing to undertake a real debate on what are the best U.S. interests in the Middle East?

The China Divide and the Future of the GOP

Robert Farley | November 08, 2011

The issue of whither U.S. relations with China is an important test case for observing the divide between the free market and neoconservative wings of the Republican Party. Thus far, the GOP presidential candidates have largely failed to articulate a vision of China that comes anywhere close to reflecting the complexity of U.S.-Chinese relations. Among the leading candidates, Mitt Romney has arguably been the most aggressive in his discussion of China policy. Yet, his embrace of a hawkish line towards Beijing would appear to indicate that President Obama’s would-be challengers have not yet found an alternative vocabulary for talking and thinking about one of the critical foreign policy issues of the 2012 election. It seems clear that even though neoconservatives lack grassroots support, they offer what is effectively the only option for an “establishment” GOP candidate, a fact that could have lasting impact both on the viability of any Republican Party foreign policy platform as well as future U.S. decision-making vis-à-vis other hotspots like Iran, Israel, and North Korea.

Right Web | rightweb.irc-online.org


1112 16th St. NW, Suite 600,
Washington, DC 20036
USA
|
|
202-234-9382

Except where otherwise noted, content on this site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License

Right Web is a project of the Institute for Policy Studies; www.ips-dc.org